Page 589 - Atlas of Creation Volume 1

Harun Yahya

realized that the KNM-ER 1470 skull’s hu- THE TALE OF LUCY
THE TALE OF LUCY
man-like face, which frequently appeared on

the covers of scientific journals and popular
VANISHED
scientific magazines, was the result of an in- VANISHED
correct assembly of skull fragments—which
“mistake” may have been deliberate. GOODBYE LUCY...
GOODBYE LUCY...
As you have seen, there is no scientific Two evolutionist anatomists, Solly Zuckerman and
discovery that supports, much less confirms, Charles Oxnard, examined the fossil named “Lucy,”
the theory of evolution, only some scientists declared to be the bipedal ancestor of all humans
just after it was unearthed in 1974. They refuted
who believe in it blindly. These scientists be- that assertion and declared that Lucy's anatomy
lieve in the myth of evolution themselves, and manner of walking in no way resembled that of

even though it lacks any scientific founda- humans, and that it was merely a species of ape.
tion, and also try to make others believe it In the following years, Lucy was announced to be
certainly a species of ape, as was headlined on the
by using deceptive constructions and preju- cover of the magazine Science et Vie. Evolutionists
diced interpretations. All the news about had to say goodbye to Lucy as the putative ancestor
of man.
the so-called “ancestor of humans” and the
illustrations used in these news are simply
fabrications. Solid evidence has demol-

ished the tale of human evolution.
In the following pages, we give some 1.There are vast anatomic dissimilarities
examples of the innumerable fossilized between the feet of humans and apes. Apes'
skulls that invalidate the theory of evolu- feet are longer, and the arch on the human
feet doesn't even exist in an ape's foot.
tion. These skulls are among the evidence 2.The upper body of humans is erect, and we
that none of these living creatures has walk upright, bipedally. This is our character-
ever changed throughout history, that istic way of movement. Apes walk by leaning
their upper body forward and using their arms
none has transformed itself into another for extra support. This anatomical gap be-
species and that every species has always tween humans and apes is impossible to be

existed with all the features it possessed bridged and totally invalidates the tall tale of
mankind's evolution.
from the very beginning. 3.As you can see in the illustrations, the op-
Along with these pieces of evidence, posable thumb, a very important characteris-
the impasse and the absence of logic in tic of the human hand, doesn't exist in an
ape's hand.
Darwinist thought are presented. For ex- Even these dissimilarities are enough to
ample, Darwinists claim that species im- show the impossibility of the evolution of hu-
proved through continuous change. But mans from apes.

how do they explain the constancy
which is regularly seen in all living crea-
tures? The theory of evolution that claims humans are supposedly descended from apes should also ex-
plain why other species have not undergone a process of transformation similar to the imaginary one
apes have supposedly experienced.
Darwinists have no answer as to why bears have not decided to become bipedal on a given day, or
why a fox has not been evolved into a skilled professor by developing its intelligence, or why a panda
has not become a painter who creates impressive works of art. The subject of evolution has been de-
picted with examples and logics that even children could easily dismiss, simply to proclaim the incon-

ceivable irrationality of Darwinism. Darwinism is presented as if it were a scientific theory, but is in fact
an inconceivably irrational ideology.
As you shall see, Darwinism is the biggest scandal in history, founded entirely on lies and fraud and
on irrational and illogical claims. The entire world will witness the final collapse of Darwinism in the
21 st century.

1. Richard E. Leakey, The Making of Mankind, London: Michael Joseph Limited, 1981, p. 43.
2. William R. Fix, The Bone Peddlers, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1984, pp. 150-153.
3. Marvin Lubenow, Bones of Contention, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1992, p. 136.
4 Ibid., p. 83.
5 Richard Allan and Tracey Greenwood, “Primates and Human Evolution” in the textbook Year 13 Biology, 1999,
Student Resource and Activity Manual, (Biozone International, printed in New Zealand), p. 260.

Adnan Oktar 587