Page 73 - The Dark Spell of Darwinism

Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar

The Dilemma in Which Evolutionists
Find Themselves

Up to this point, we have seen that evolutionists hold absurd and un-
reasonable tenets that even people with normal intelligence and ordinary
knowledge would not believe; moreover, they blindly accept theories that
are contrary to science.
There may be two explanations why anyone could believe claims so
strange and irrational. The first is lack of knowledge: Someone who has
never considered evolution and knows very little about it, may at first be
deceived by its scientific guise into accepting what he is told, especially if he
has never examined or researched its claims. But when he is presented with
the facts and allowed to consider them, this individual will easily see how
absurd and impossible the theory of evolution really is. A short handbook
or a two- to three-hour lecture will be enough to demonstrate the theory's
invalidity. A person with normal intelligence will easily see the fact that
evolution is nonsense. Therefore, ignorance is a deficiency that is easily dis-
posed of.
As the result of a few years' work, many people's lack of knowledge
about evolution has been remedied, and those with common sense have
seen the real face of the theory of evolution. Today, even a primary student
will be able to list proofs showing the invalidity of the theory and state how
nonsensical it is.

The second reason, quite different from the first, concerns those who
are not ignorant. Generally, these people are quite cultured and some are
even experts in evolutionary topics relevant to such fields as biology, pale-
ontology and microbiology. You may present them with as many clear
proofs as you wish for the invalidity of evolution; you may give them ex-
amples to convince them of their unreasonableness. But they'll be deter-
mined not to abandon the theory, just like the man we mentioned at the be-
ginning of this chapter who insisted that clouds in the sky were masses of
cotton. For example, they show you a fossil as a proof of evolution, but you

71