Page 182 - Once Upon a Time There Was Darwinism

Once Upon a Time
There Was Darwinism

small to large. . . As more fossils were uncovered . . . it
was all too apparent that evolution had not been in a straight
line at all. 127
The fossils could not be arranged to show a gradual evolu-
tion, such as Darwin had envisioned. The evolutionist, Francis

Hitching, explains:
Even when all possible fossils are included, there appear to be major
jumps in size of horses from one genus to the next, without transitional
examples. 128
Today, the horse series gives evolutionists nothing to hope for.
It has been discovered that horses lived at the same time as their sup-
posed ancestors and even side by side with them, and so evidently

there is no way to establish an ancestral lineage among them.
Besides, many characteristics discovered in the tooth and bone struc-
ture of horses invalidate this sequence. All this points to one evident
fact: There was never any evolutionary relationship among these se-
quenced creatures. As with all others, these genera in their fossil lay-
ers appeared all at once. Despite all their efforts, evolutionists have
not been able to demonstrate transitional characteristics among these
genera, and it's worth a closer look at the horse series that Darwinists
once defended so intently.

Inconsistency and Admissions by Evolutionists

Contrary to the evolutionist scenario displayed in muse-
ums and textbooks, the horse series is inconsistent in
terms of various criteria. First of all, evolutionists

180