Page 253 - Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)

considerable decline in the number of students believing in the theory
of evolution in French schools, and attributed this to the impact of the
Atlas of Creation in France. Darwinist professors explicitly described
this huge blow inflicted on Darwinism as “severe,” distressing” and “a
humiliation” for Darwinism. 159
The Swedish embryologist Soren Lovtrup makes the following
analysis of the current position of the Darwinist deception:

I suppose that nobody will deny that it is a great misfortune if an entire
branch of science becomes addicted to a false theory. But this is what has
happened in biology: for a long time now people discuss evolutionary
problems in a peculiar “Darwinian” vocabulary- “adaption.” “selection
pressure,” “natural selection.” Etc. – thereby believing that they con-
tribute to the explanation of natural events. They do not...
I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest de-
ceit in the history of science. 160
The fact that Darwinism is the worst deception in history is cur-

rently spreading rapidly right across the world. Obstacles put in place
against the fact of Creation by official institutions such as the European
Council reveal the terrible panic that Darwinists are in. Never before in
history has an assembly representing nation states lined up behind a
deception and taken an official decision to support a fraud. That is the
state to which Darwinist panic has brought the supporters of
Darwinism in the 21 Century. Darwinists imagine that they can keep
st
this deception propped up by means of repressive governmental deci-
sions, making evolution an obligatory part of classes, seeking to con-
ceal the fact of Creation from students by making one-sided use of the
judiciary and engaging in a one-sided imposition. The fact is, however,

that the honest conclusion reached by millions of people in the face of
Darwinist deception is far superior to all the oppressive and imposed
measures and the results therefrom.
No Darwinist can alter people’s definitive opinions through any

251