Page 84 - The Transitional Form Dilemma

THE TRANSITIONAL-FORM DILEMMA

mammals is one of the most difficult for evolutionists to explain. In
most of their sources, they suggest that sea mammals’ ancestors lived
on land and over a long period of time, evolved, in such a way as to
adapt to life in a marine environment. According to this view, marine
mammals—whose alleged ancestors, fish, are assumed to have under-
gone a transition from sea to the land—returned to the water as the re-
sult of further so-called evolutionary pressures. The fact is however, no
paleontological evidence supports this theory, which also flies in the
face of logic.
The theory of evolution’s claim regarding the
origin of whales rests on a fossil sequence, in
which a series of species are arranged in an imag-
Pakicetus inary sequence and then proposed as
(50 million years old)
transitional forms of whales’ evolu-
tion.
According to evolutionists, the
Ambulocetus
(49 million years old) geological sequence followed
by these creatures is as fol-
Kutchicetus
(43-46 million years old)

Rodhocetus
(46.5 million years old) EVOLUTIONISTS’ CLAIMS OF
A “WALKING WHALE”
ARE UNSCIENTIFIC

Dorudon
(37 million years old)

Basilosaurus
(37 million years old)

82