Page 60 - June
P. 60

PROFESSIONAL ADVICE

               The Steadyline system can enable typical long-overhang operations to be performed at
        least twice as fast as with non-damped tools while enhancing part surface finish, extending tool
        life, and reducing stress on the machine tool. Passive/dynamic vibration damping technology
        can make it possible to accomplish certain applications,
        such as some uses of tool lengths of up to 10 times bar
        diameter, that would not otherwise be possible even at
        minimal machining parameters.


        Dynamic / Passive Vibration Operating principles

               Figures  4 and  5 show how the Steadyline
        Dynamic  / Passive Vibration Management  System
        works.  In  Figure  4,  vibration-related  characteristics
        of  a  traditional monoblock holder  include mass
        (M1),  stiffness  (K1)  and  intrinsic  vibration  damping
        characteristic  (K'1).  The  characteristics  are  combined
        into the  MKK  'system.  During  machining, the  cutting
        force  Fe  creates  movement  (vibration)  in  the  holder.
        When  using the  Steadyline  system  (Figure  5),  the
        following characteristics of the second MKK 'system are
        added: mass M2, stiffness K12 and K'12 density. The
        natural frequency of the MKK 'S2 system corresponds to
        the original MKK' system, it resonates in antiphase with
        unwanted vibration, dampening energy and vibration.
        In  the  Steadyline  system,  the  shock  absorbing  mass
        is located at the front of the holder, where it is most               Fig. 3.
        likely to flex. Mass can instantly dampen vibration that
        propagates from the cutting edge to the holder body.
        The Steadyline system also includes short, compact GL cutting heads that position the cutting
        edge close to the damping mass for maximum vibration damping. The system is suitable for a
        variety of operations and is especially useful in milling (contouring, grooving and pocketing),
        turning, and rough and fine boring.

        Application Comparisons
               A  good  example  of  the  Steadyline  system’s  effectiveness  involved  a  difficult  boring
        operation in 42CrMo4 steel where a cylindrical 105.8 mm bore was enlarged to a conical 129
        mm bore in five roughing passes at a 3 mm depth of cut decreasing to 0 mm depth. With an
        80 mm dia. bar, the initial cutting length was 600 mm, representing an extended tool length-
        to-diameter ratio of 7.5. Roughing was accomplished at a feed rate of 0.3 mm/rev and cutting
        speed of 157 m/min. Pre-finishing to a final 130 mm diameter took place at 0.5 mm depth of
        cut, 0.2 mm/rev feed rate, and a cutting speed of 200 m/min. Even though the bulk of the

    60     Stanochniy park
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65