Page 38 - EdViewptsSpring2020
P. 38

is used not only to identify the need for   tal Literacy Instruction. Students who
      literacy support, but it is also employed   receive basic skills instruction work on   This literacy matrix is
      to establish depth, scope, and sequence  areas of identified weaknesses through   used not only to identify
      of literacy intervention. This process   curriculum-based instruction. Those
      targets a larger number of students than   who qualify for Supplemental Literacy   the need for literacy
      is required by the first level of screening   Instruction access a more prescribed,   support, but it is also
      as outlined by PL 2013, c. 105.      multi-sensory learning experience where   employed to establish
      The Intervention and Referral Services   lessons are developed and implement-  depth, scope, and
      Committee (I&RS) operates as both a   ed by a reading specialist, who is also a
      clearinghouse, which holds all of the   master Orton-Gillingham Teacher, with a   sequence of literacy
      collected data, and a response to inter-  special education background.    intervention.
      vention decision making center. Every   Supplemental Literacy Instruction is
      student who is reading below grade   delivered in a variety of ways ranging   To recap, once literacy gaps are identi-
      level, presents with weaknesses in any   from one-to-one instruction, small group   fied, the process of intervening, moni-
      of the aforementioned target areas, and/  instruction, or instruction that is integrat-  toring and re-assessing is continual.
      or whose deficits are identified as being   ed within their general education class-  Interventions and monitoring continue
      statistically significant, is monitored by   room. The choice of setting and service   until deficits have been appropriately
      the I&RS. Committee members are      delivery is dependent on the identified   addressed. Each tier leads to further,
      actively involved in providing options   gap in the student’s literacy skills. The   more in-depth screening. This pro-
      and guidelines for executing classroom-  district supports Sally Shaywitz’s notion   vides the clinician with a prescriptive
      based interventions dependent on areas   that “reading instruction for the dyslexic   academic plan to use while developing
      of weakness. If necessary, the reading   reader must be delivered with great in-  and implementing interventions. If it
      specialist is available on a consultation   tensity. A child who is struggling to read   becomes evident that the level of aca-
      basis to demonstrate how to deliver   should be in a group of three to four   demic support must be augmented for
      specific research-based interventions or   students, and should receive a special-  a student to be able to access the cur-
      to help staff members understand de-  ized reading instruction at least four, and   riculum, a referral is made to the child
      velopmental trajectory of literacy skills.   preferably five days a week.”   study team. Supplemental Literacy
      For example, students should recognize   Several studies have proven that when   Instruction, delivered as a related ser-
      rhymes and alliterations by the age of 4.   children with reading difficulties are   vice, is delineated within the student’s
      A typically developing 9-year-old should   identified early and are provided with   Individual Educational Plan (IEP). The
      be able to engage with longer and    interventions, their chance of achieving   student’s reading gap is the center of
      more complex phonological awareness   academic success increases. As such,   the decision making process as to fre-
      deletion tasks. Additional interventions   pupils are monitored weekly to track   quency and duration of Supplementary
      provided include, but are not limited to:  progress, which guides instruction. Af-  Literacy Instruction. Special education
        1. An inclusive classroom that     ter 6-8 weeks of intervention, students’   students will typically require more
           follows a co-teaching model.    skills are surveyed and compared to   frequent reading intervention sessions
        2. A collaborative teaching model   baseline data to determine effective-  than their general education peers.
           to support both the teacher and   ness of instruction. If students are   Services are delivered on a one-to-
           students. In this model, an inter-  performing at the same percentile and/  one/small group basis. Worthy of note,
           vention specialist demonstrates   or lower, a second level screener is ad-  the delivery of reading services is
           teaching strategies and accom-  ministered to further dissect reading dif-  continual regardless of the outcome
           modations to assist students that   ficulties and to gain a fuller understand-  of a comprehensive education evalua-
           are at risk of reading failure.   ing of need. This screener is employed   tion. Supplemental Literacy Instruction
        3. Reading instruction and small   to scrutinize students’ phonological   as a related service can be accessed
           group tutelage to be provided   awareness abilities because, according   by either general education or special
           within the student’s classroom   to the CTOPP, “a deficit in phonological   education students. This coordina-
           setting to reinforce previously   awareness is viewed as the hallmark   tion and interplay of reading services
           taught skills.                  of a reading disability or dyslexia”   across all student abilities and aca-
      Although a concerted effort is made to   (Wagne, R., Torgesen, J., Rashotte,   demic environments is a differentiating
                                           C.). If phonological weaknesses are ob-
      provide interventions within the general   served, a more comprehensive evalu-  factor that has positively impacted our
      education environment, there are times   ation is conducted, which provides   students’ ability to access interven-
                                                                                tions, experience literacy growth, and
      when a more individualized approach   normative data used to pinpoint reading  gain confidence in their ability to inter-
      is necessary. In such cases, the read-  and writing concerns and develop an
      ing specialist, the child study team, and   intervention plan. In grades three and   act with grade level curriculum.
      general education teachers examine a   up, a fluency and comprehension as-
      student’s rate of learning given class-  sessment is also administered along
      room-based reading intervention. At this   with the comprehensive reading and
      point, struggling students will be referred   writing evaluation.
      to either Basic Skills or Supplemen-

                                            Educational Viewpoints       -36-       Spring 2020
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43