Page 57 - EdViewptsSpring2019-web
P. 57

2006; Picciano, 2006; Halverson,     cur annually at Cheesequake School   ten on the inside cover, as well as a
          Grigg, Prichett, & Thomas, 2007).    and now districtwide in Old Bridge.   personal goal. The teacher identifies
          The advent and requirement of        The first phase involves analyzing and   various resources such as apps and
          “Student Growth Objectives (SGOs)”   taking action based on the school/   adaptive software which the student
          literally codified the expectation of the   grade level results; second, individual   can use to work on his/her weakness.
          use of data informed instruction by   student data; and third, detailed indi-  Students complete an ongoing log
          classroom teachers. One could argue   vidual teacher results. During phase   documenting the date, focus skill(s),
          that these required practices have   one, the Soar the Scores (hereinafter,   resource/app/website used, and the
          fostered systemic growth in teacher   STS) School/Grade Level Analysis and  outcome. This simple practice informs
          capacity for classroom data usage and   Domain Level Analysis Reports are   every student about his/her results on
          practice. That being said, building a   introduced at opening faculty meet-  the state assessment, specific weak-
          robust district culture of data informed   ings. Specific grade level strengths   nesses and strengths, and empowers
          decision-making requires a coordi-   and weaknesses are discussed in a    the student to take constructive action.
          nated approach between classroom,    constructive, growth-mindset oriented   It can be asserted that this practice
          school and district (Achieve, 2012;   manner (Dweck, 2008) and subse-     has led to gains in state assessment
          Marsh & Farrell, 2015). This article   quently become the foci of teachers’   outcomes for most students and fur-
          will outline a systems-based approach   SGOs. Since the institution of this   ther deepened the data-driven growth
          to utilizing student performance data   practice, a direct correlation has been   mindset throughout Cheesequake
          through which best practices become   observed between where teach-       school.
          formalized and consistent. Offered   ers focus their attention and student   The final phase examines teacher
          will be several simple and effective   outcomes. Under the direction of the   outcomes from the previous year.
          practices that school and district   district Office of Academics, all schools   Detailed Soar the Scores SGP Re-
          leaders can use not only to formalize   throughout Old Bridge are strongly   ports and STS Teacher Strength
          these processes but also to intertwine   encouraged to use school and grade   Reports are created for all Old Bridge
          them with other mandates such as     level results to drive SGOs.         teachers who receive Student Growth
          teacher Student Growth Objectives,   The second phase of data use, which   Percentile (SGP) scores. The first
          Professional Development Plans, and   also takes place in September to Oc-  report informs the teacher of the SGP
          Performance Evaluations.             tober annually, is the analysis of indi-  score for each of his/her students
          One powerful case study that il-     vidual student level data. New Jersey   from the previous school year and
          lustrates how systemic use of data   provides Individual Student Reports   illustrates how the student scored
          can lead to powerful outcomes is     (ISRs) to be sent home to parents,   before having the teacher and after
          Cheesequake Elementary School in     but in the majority of school districts   in every domain. Most teachers in the
          Old Bridge, NJ, a school that has won   teachers may not use or even see the   state merely receive their mSGP, or
          three national awards in the last five   ISRs. Conversely, in Old Bridge, Soar   median SGP, number from the state
          years. Cheesequake is a diverse, Title   the Scores Current Roster Reports   which provide neither specificity into
          I school which has a 35% free and    as well as STS Content Standards     how the score was derived nor insight
          reduced lunch rate, minorities com-  Current Roster reports are created   regarding where to place focus for
          prise 50% of the student population,   and distributed to teachers provid-  improvement. Teachers in Cheese-
          and approximately 8% of students     ing access to detailed assessment    quake and throughout the Old Bridge
          are English Language Learners. Dr.   results for all students on their current   district reflect upon specific students
          Thomas Ferry, the Cheesequake Prin-  rosters. This makes the state assess-  and groups of students that had high
          cipal, a former mathematics teacher,   ment data actionable for each teacher   or low growth, complete reflection
          and founder of Soar the Scores LLC,   while maintaining appropriate student   sheets, and examine domains in which
          provides data leadership and analysis   confidentiality.                  their cohort of students increased or
          as well as professional development   To ensure that every student is     declined in score.
          on the school and district levels. Over   likewise taking meaningful action on   The second report, the STS Teacher
          the last 8 years, Cheesequake School   the individual data, teachers at Chee-  Strength Report, drills down into
          has built its capacity to use data in a   equake School are required to imple-  teacher performance even further and
          purposeful, systemic manner. Cheese-  ment “Growth Mindset Portfolios” for   allows the teacher to see the aggre-
          quake was named a 2014 National      each student. Each teacher conducts   gated outcome for their previous class-
          School of Character, a 2015 National   individual conferences/coaching    es of students in every domain and
          Title I Distinguished School and most   sessions, informs the student of the   subsets of standards/skills. By taking
          recently in 2017, was named a Nation-  outcomes on the most recent state   information from the Pearson Content
          al Blue Ribbon School of Excellence.   assessment, and highlights his/her   Standards Report databases, complet-
          The school’s systematic use of data   strengths and specific weaknesses   ing calculations, and highlighting in
          has undoubtedly been integral to this   (which are referred to instead as “not   green or red whether the student and
          success.                             yet strengths”). The student then cre-  entire class was above or below the
          There are three phases to optimal use   ates a folder in which his/her specific   state in terms of percentage of pos-
          of state assessment results, which oc-  strengths and weaknesses are writ-  sible points earned, each teacher can

                                            Educational Viewpoints       -55-       Spring 2019
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62