Page 140 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat

Endnotes CHAPTER 4 • Foundations of Decision Making 139

1. J. Zucker, “Proof in the Eating,” Effects of Rational Factors and Betsch and A. Blockner, “Intuition January–February 2002, 58–64; B.
Fast Company, March 2013, 34+. Behavioral Biases on the Manage- in Judgment and Decision Mak- L. Killingsworth, M. B. Hayden,
2. A. Blackman, “Inside the Execu- rial Choice to Invest in Corporate ing: Extensive Thinking without and R. Schellenberger, “A Net-
tive Brain,” Wall Street Journal, Responsibility,” Managerial and Effort,” Psychological Inquiry, work Expert System Management
April 28, 2014, R1. Decision Economics, April 2011, October–December 2010, 279–94; System of Multiple Domains,”
3. See, for example, A. Nagurney, 205–13; A. Langley, “In Search R. Lange and J. Houran, “A Trans- Journal of Information Science
J. Dong, and P. L. Mokhtarian, of Rationality: The Purposes Be- liminal View of Intuitions in the (March–April 2001): 81; and S.
“Multicriteria Network Equilib- hind the Use of Formal Analysis Workplace,” North American Jour- Balakrishnan, N. Popplewell, and
rium Modeling with Variable in Organizations,” Administra- nal of Psychology 12, no. 3 (2010): M. Thomlinson, “Intelligent Ro-
Weights for Decision-Making tive Science Quarterly, December 501–16; E. Dane and M. G. Pratt, botic Assembly,” Computers &
in the Information Age with Ap- 1989, 598–631; and H. A. Simon, “Exploring Intuition and Its Role Industrial Engineering, December
plications to the Telecommuting “Rationality in Psychology and in Managerial Decision Making,” 2000, 467.
and Teleshopping,” Journal of Economics,” Journal of Business Academy of Management Review, 23. “Next: Big Idea,” Fast Company,
Economic Dynamics and Control (October 1986), 209–24. January 2007, 33–54; M. H. Ba- December 2010–January 2011,
(August 2002): 1629–50. 13. See D. R. A. Skidd, “Revisiting zerman and D. Chugh, “Decisions 39–40.
4. J. Flinchbaugh, “Surfacing Prob- Bounded Rationality,” Journal of without Blinders,” Harvard Busi- 24. H. McCracken, “50 Most Inno-
lems Daily: Advice for Build- Management Inquiry (December ness Review, January 2006, 88–97; vative Companies: LINE,” Fast
ing a Problem-Solving Culture,” 1992): 343–47; B. E. Kaufman, C. C. Miller and R. D. Ireland, Company, March 2015, 84+.
Industry Week, April 2011, 12; “A New Theory of Satisficing,” “Intuition in Strategic Decision 25. And the Survey Says box based on
“Business Analysis Training Journal of Behavioral Econom- Making: Friend or Foe in the Fast- D. Kahneman, D. Lovallo, and O.
Helps Leaders Achieve an Enter- ics (Spring 1990): 35–51; and N. Paced 21st Century,” Academy of Siboney, “Before You Make That
prise-Wide Perspective,” Leader McK. Agnew and J. L. Brown, Management Executive, February Big Decision,” Harvard Busi-
to Leader, Fall 2010, 63–65; D. “Bounded Rationality: Fallible 2005, 19–30; E. Sadler-Smith and ness Review, June 2011, 50–60; P.
Okes, “Common Problems with Decisions in Unbounded Decision E. Shefy, “The Intuitive Executive: Wang, “To Make Better Choices,
Basic Problem Solving,” Quality, Space,” Behavioral Science, July Understanding and Applying ‘Gut Choose Less,” Money, June 2010,
September 2010, 36–40; J. Saw- 1986, 148–61. Feel’ in Decision-Making,” Acad- 111–14; B. Dumaine, “The Trou-
yer, “Problem-Solving Success 14. From the Past to the Present box emy of Management Executive, ble with Teams,” Fortune, Septem-
Tips,” Business and Economic Re- based on M. Ibrahim, “Theory November 2004, 76–91; and L. A. ber 5, 1994, 86–92; A. S. Wellner,
view, April–June 2002, 23–24. of Bounded Rationality,” Public Burke and M. K. Miller, “Taking “A Perfect Brainstorm,” Inc., Oc-
5. See J. Figueira and B. Ray, “Deter- Management, June 2009, 3–5; D. the Mystery Out of Intuitive Deci- tober 2003, 31–35; “The Poll,”
mining the Weights of Criteria in A. Wren, The Evolution of Man- sion Making,” Academy of Man- BusinessWeek, August 21–28,
the Electre Type of Methods with agement Thought, Fourth Edition agement Executive, October 1999, 2006, 44; “Hurry Up and Decide,”
a Revised Simons’ Procedure,” (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 91–99. BusinessWeek, May 14, 2001, 16;
European Journal of Operational Inc., 1994), 291; and H. A. Simon, 19. C. C. Miller and R. D. Ireland, “In- J. MacIntyre, “Bosses and Bureau-
Research, June 1, 2002, 317–26. Administrative Behavior (New tuition in Strategic Decision Mak- cracy,” Springfield, Missouri Busi-
6. For instance, see M. Elliott, York: Macmillan Company, 1945). ing: Friend or Foe,” 20. ness Journal, August 1–7, 2005,
“Breakthrough Thinking,” IIE 15. See, for example, G. McNamara, 20. E. Sadler-Smith and E. Shefy, 29; J. Crick, and “On the Road to
Solution, October 2001, 22–25; H. Moon, and P. Bromiley, “Bank- “Developing Intuitive Awareness Invention,” Fast Company, Febru-
and B. Fazlollahi and R. Vahidov, ing on Commitment: Intended in Management Education,” Acad- ary 2005, 16.
“A Method for Generation of Al- and Unintended Consequences emy of Management Learning & 26. A. Deutschman, “Inside the Mind
ternatives by Decision Support of an Organization’s Attempt to Education, June 2007, 186–205. of Jeff Bezos,” Fast Company, Au-
Systems,” Journal of Management Attenuate Escalation of Commit- 21. M. G. Seo and L. Feldman Barrett, gust 2004, 50–58.
Information Systems (Fall 2001): ment,” Academy of Management “Being Emotional During Deci- 27. See, for instance, S. Schulz-Hardt,
229–50. Journal (April 2002): 443–52; V. sion Making—Good or Bad? An A. Mojzisch, F. C. Brodbeck, R.
7. D. Miller, Q. Hope, R. Eisenstat, S. Rao and A. Monk, “The Ef- Empirical Investigation,” Academy Kerschreiter, and D. Frey, “Group
N. Foote, and J. Galbraith, “The fects of Individual Differences and of Management Journal (August Decision Making in Hidden Profile
Problem of Solutions: Balancing Anonymity on Commitment to 2007): 923–40. Situations: Dissent as a Facilitator
Clients and Capabilities,” Busi- Decisions,” Journal of Social Psy- 22. Technology and the Manager’s for Decision Quality,” Journal of
ness Horizons, March–April 2002, chology (August 1999): 496–515; Job box based on M. Xu, V. Ong, Personality and Social Psychol-
3–12. C. F. Camerer and R. A. Weber, Y. Duan, and B. Mathews, “Intelli- ogy (December 2006), 1080–83;
8. E. Teach, “Avoiding Decision “The Econometrics and Behav- gent Agent Systems for Executive and C. K. W. DeDreu and M. A.
Traps,” CFO, June 2004, 97–99; ioral Economics of Escalation of Information Scanning, Filtering, West, “Minority Dissent and Team
and D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Commitment: A Re-examination and Interpretation: Perceptions Innovation: The Importance of
“Judgment Under Uncertainty: of Staw’s Theory,” Journal of Eco- and Challenges,” Information Pro- Participation in Decision Making,”
Heuristics and Biases,” Science nomic Behavior and Organization cessing & Management, March Journal of Applied Psychology
185 (1974): 1124–31. (May 1999): 59–82; D. R. Bobo- 2011, 186–201; J. P. Kallunki, E. (December 2001): 1191–1201.
9. Information for this section taken cel and J. P. Meyer, “Escalating K. Laitinen, and H. Silvola, “Im- 28. S. Mohammed, “Toward an Under-
from S. P. Robbins, Decide & Commitment to a Failing Course pact of Enterprise Resource Plan- standing of Cognitive Consensus
Conquer (Upper Saddle River, of Action: Separating the Roles ning Systems on Management in a Group Decision-Making Con-
NJ: Financial Times/Prentice Hall, of Choice and Justification,” Jour- Control Systems and Firm Perfor- text,” Journal of Applied Behavior-
2004). nal of Applied Psychology (June mance,” International Journal of al Science (December 2001): 408.
10. T. A. Stewart, “Did You Ever Have 1994): 360–63; and B. M. Staw, Accounting Information Systems 29. M. J. Fambrough and S. A. Com-
to Make Up Your Mind?” Har- “The Escalation of Commitment (March 2011), 20–39; H. W. K. erford, “The Changing Episte-
vard Business Review, January to a Course of Action,” Academy Chia, C. L. Tan, and S. Y. Sung, mological Assumptions of Group
2006, 12; and E. Pooley, “Editor’s of Management Review, October “Enhancing Knowledge Discovery Theory,” Journal of Applied
Desk,” Fortune, June 27, 2005, 16. 1981, 577–87. via Association-Based Evolution Behavioral Science (September
11. J. G. March, “Decision-Making 16. L. Alderman, “A Shoemaker That of Neural Logic Networks,” IEEE 2006): 330–49.
Perspective: Decisions in Organi- Walks but Never Runs,” New York Transactions on Knowledge and 30. R. A. Meyers, D. E. Brashers, and
zations and Theories of Choice,” Times Online, October 8, 2010. Data Engineering (July 2006): J. Hanner, “Majority-Minority In-
in A. H. Van de Ven and W. F. 17. C. Flora, “When to Go with Your 889–901; F. Harvey, “A Key Role fluence: Identifying Argumenta-
Joyce (eds.), Perspectives on Gut,” Women’s Health, June 2009, in Detecting Fraud Patterns: Neu- tive Patterns and Predicting Argu-
Organization Design and Be- 68–70. ral Networks,” Financial Times, ment-Outcome Links,” Journal of
havior (New York: Wiley-Inter- 18. See J. Evans, “Intuition and Rea- January 23, 2002, 3; D. Mitchell Communication (Autumn 2000):
science, 1981), 232–33. soning: A Dual-Process Perspec- and R. Pavur, “Using Modular 3–30.
12. See T. Shavit and A. M. Adam, tive,” Psychological Inquiry, Oc- Neural Networks for Business De- 31. See, for instance, T. Horton,
“A Preliminary Exploration of the tober–December 2010, 313–26; T. cisions,” Management Decision, “Groupthink in the Boardroom,”