Page 141 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat

140 Part 2 • Planning
Directors and Boards, Winter “NCAA Reaches $20 Mil- International Journal of Produc- 57. S. Lohr, “Sure, Big Data Is Great.
2002, 9. lion Settlement with Ex-Players tion Economics (May 6, 2001): But So Is Intuition,” New York
32. I. L. Janis, Groupthink (Boston: over Videogames,” Wall Street 101–09. Times Online, December 29, 2012.
Houghton Mifflin, 1982). See also Journal, http://www.wsj.com/ 47. T. M. Amabile, “Motivating Cre- 58. S. Rosenbush and L. Stevens, “At
J. Chapman, “Anxiety and Defec- articles/ncaa-unveils-20-million- ativity in Organizations,” Cali- UPS, the Algorithm Is the Driver,”
tive Decision Making: An Elabo- settlement-with-ex-players-over- fornia Management Review (Fall Wall Street Journal, February 17,
ration of the Groupthink Mode,” videogames-1402330931, June 9, 1997): 39–58. 2015, B1+; D. Zax, “Brown Down:
Management Decision, October 2014; and C. Smith, “The Most 48. D. Dunne and R. Martin, “Design UPS Drivers vs. the UPS Algo-
2006, 1391–1404. Valuable Conferences in College Thinking and How It Will Change rithm,” http://www.fastcompany.
33. See, for example, T. W. Costello Sports 2014,” www.forbes.com, Management Education: An Inter- com/3004319/brown-down-ups-
and S. S. Zalkind, eds., Psychol- April 15, 2014. view and Discussion,” Academy of drivers-vs-ups-algorithm, January
ogy in Administration: A Research 36. J. Wagstaff, “Brainstorming Management Learning & Educa- 3, 2013; T. Bingham and P. Ga-
Orientation (Upper Saddle River, Requires Drinks,” Far East- tion, December 2006, 512. lagan, “Delivering ‘On-Time, Ev-
NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963), 429–30; ern Economic Review, May 2, 49. M. Korn and R. E. Silverman, ery Time’ Knowledge and Skills
R. A. Cooke and J. A. Kernaghan, 2002, 34. “Forget B-School, D-School Is to a World of Employees,” T&D,
“Estimating the Difference be- 37. T. Kelley, “Six Ways to Kill a Hot,” Wall Street Journal, June July 2012, 32–37; J. Levitz, “UPS
tween Group versus Individual Brainstormer,” Across the Board, 7, 2012, B1+; R. Martin and J. Thinks Outside the Box on Driver
Performance on Problem Solving March–April 2002, 12. Euchner, “Design Thinking,” Re- Training,” Wall Street Journal, April
Tasks,” Group and Organization 38. K. L. Dowling and R. D. St. Lou- search Technology Management, 6, 2010, B1+; and K. Kingsbury,
Studies, September 1987, 319–42; is, “Asynchronous Implementa- May/June 2012, 10–14; T. Larsen “Road to Recovery,” Time, March
and L. K. Michaelsen, W. E. Wat- tion of the Nominal Group Tech- and T. Fisher, “Design Thinking: 8, 2010, Global 14–Global 16.
son, and R. H. Black, “A Realistic nique: Is It Effective,” Decision A Solution to Fracture-Critical 59. Rosenbush and Stevens, “At UPS,
Test of Individual versus Group Support Systems, October 2000, Systems,” DMI News & Views, the Algorithm Is the Driver.”
Consensus Decision Making,” 229–48. May 2012, 31; T. Berno, “De- 60. Zax, “Brown Down: UPS Drivers
Journal of Applied Psychology 39. See also B. Andersen and T. Fager- sign Thinking versus Creative vs. the UPS Algorithm.”
(October 1989): 834–39. See also haug, “The Nominal Group Tech- Intelligence,” DMI News & Views, 61. Rosenbush and Laura Stevens, “At
J. Hollenbeck, D. R. Ilgen, J. A. nique,” Quality Progress, Febru- May 2012, 28; J. Liedtka and Tim UPS, the Algorithm Is the Driver.”
Colquitt, and A. Ellis, “Gender ary 2000, 144. Ogilvie, “Helping Business Man- 62. Hong Kong Jockey Club WebSite;
Composition, Situational Strength, 40. J. Burdett, “Changing Channels: agers Discover Their Appetite for P. Catton and C. Herrings, “Do
and Team Decision-Making Accu- Using the Electronic Meeting Sys- Design Thinking,” Design Man- H orses Really Need Jockeys?” The
racy: A Criterion Decomposition tem to Increase Equity in Decision agement Review, Issue 1, 2012, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com,
Approach,” Organizational Be- Making,” Information Technology, 6–13; and T. Brown, “Strategy May 3, 2012; McKenzie, “Space-
havior and Human Decision Pro- Learning, and Performance Jour- by Design,” Fast Company, June age skyscrapers and sheiks: Racing’s
cesses, May 2002, 445–75. nal (Fall 2000): 3–12. 2005, 52–54. new world order,” CNN Website,
34. See, for example, L. K. Mi- 41. “Fear of Flying,” Business Europe, 50. C. Guglielmo, “Apple Loop: The http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/29/
chaelsen, W. E. Watson, and R. October 3, 2001, 2. Week in Review,” Forbes.com, sport/dubai-world-cup-horse-
H. Black, “A Realistic Test of In- 42. “VC at Nestlé,” Business Europe, May 25, 2012, 2. racing/, March 29, 2013; C. Galo-
dividual versus Group Consensus October 3, 2001, 3. 51. D. Dunne and R. Martin, “Design faro, “The Latest: Keep black cats
Decision Making,” Journal of Ap- 43. M. Roberti, “Meet Me on the Thinking and How It Will Change away from Baffert,” Associated
plied Psychology (October 1989): Web,” Fortune: Tech Supplement, Management Education: An Inter- Press, http://bigstory.ap.org/article
834–39; and P. W. Pease, M. Winter 2002, 10. view and Discussion,” 514. /7c6d91b3926346b9b8989426a66
Beiser, and M. E. Tubbs, “Fram- 44. See also, J. A. Hoxmeier and K. A. 52. K. Cukier and V. Mayer-Schön- 6044e/latest-fans-stream-churchill-
ing Effects and Choice Shifts in Kozar, “Electronic Meetings and berger, “The Financial Bonanza downs-derby-day, May 3, 2015;
Group Decision Making,” Orga- Subsequent Meeting Behavior: of Big Data,” Wall Street Journal, A. Waller, J. Daniels, N. Weaver,
nizational Behavior and Human Systems as Agents of Change,” March 8, 2013, A15. P. Robinson, 2000. “Jockey inju-
Decision Processes, October Journal of Applied Management 53. R. King and S. Rosenbush, “Big ries in the United States,” Journal
1993, 149–65. Studies (December 2000): 177–95. Data Broadens Its Range,” Wall of the American Medical Associa-
35. M. Strachan, “NCAA Schools 45. See, for instance, P. Berthon, L. F. Street Journal, March 14, 2013, B5. tion, 283(10), 1326–28; J. Roach,
Can Absolutely Afford to Pay Pitt, and M. T. Ewing, “Corollaries 54. “Big Data, Big Impact: New Pos- “The Science of Horse Racing,”
College Athletes, Economists of the Collective: The Influence sibilities for International Devel- www.nbcnews.com, 2013.
Say,” http://www.huffingtonpost. of Organizational Culture and opment,” World Economic Forum, 63. D. D. Stanford, “Coke Has a Se-
com/2015/03/27/ncaa-pay-student- Memory Development on Per- weforum.org, 2012. cret Formula for Orange Juice,
athletes_n_6940836.html, March ceived Decision-Making Context,” 55. M. Kassel, “From a Molehill to a Too,” Bloomberg Businessweek,
27, 2015; A. Zimbalist, “Pay- Academy of Marketing Science Mountain,” Wall Street Journal, February 4–10, 2013, 19–20; P.
ing College Athletes: Take Two,” Journal (Spring 2001): 135–50. March 11, 2013, R1. Sellers, “The New Coke,” Fortune,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ 46. J. de Haan, M. Yamamoto, and 56. D. Laney, “The Importance of May 21, 2012, 138–44; and Adi
andrew-zimbalist/paying-college- G. Lovink, “Production Planning ‘Big Data’: A Definition,” www. Ignatious, “Shaking Things Up
athletes-take-two_b_6961314. in Japan: Rediscovering Lost gartner.com/it-glossary/big-data/, at Coca-Cola,” Harvard Business
html, March 28, 2015; S. Terlep, Experiences or New Insights,” March 22, 2013. Review, October 2011, 94–99.