Page 252 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat
P. 252

Endnotes                                                CHAPTER 7   •  Managing Human Resources    251



                      1.  Material for this chapter is drawn   Referral Saves Time, Saves Mon-  Ethnic Group Differences: The Val-  DeRouin, B. A. Fritzsche, and E.
                       from D.  A. DeCenzo and S. P.   ey, Delivers Quality,”  Workforce,   ue May Be Larger Than Research-  Salas, “E-Learning in Organiza-
                       Robbins,  Fundamentals of Hu-  June 2001, 66–72.      ers Thought,”  Journal  of Applied   tions,”  Journal of Management
                       man Resources Management, 10th     7.  B. Horovitz, “Layoffs Sting Icons   Psychology (April 2002): 369–76;   (December 2005): 920–40; K.
                       ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &   Coca-Cola and McDonalds,” USA   and E. Hermelin and I. T. Robert-  O’Leonard, HP Case Study: Flex-
                       Sons, 2010).               Today, January 9, 2015, 5B.  son, “A Critique and Standardiza-  ible Solutions for Multi-Cultural
                      2.  From the Past to the Present     8.  B.  Tuttle, “Why  These 5 Compa-  tion of Meta-Analytic Coefficients   Learners (Oakland: CA: Bersin
                       box  based  on  D.  A.  Wren  and   nies Are Laying Off Thousands of   in Personnel Selection,” Journal of   &  Associates,  2004);  S. Green-
                       A. G. Bedeian, The Evolution of   Workers,” http://time.com/money/   Occupational  and  Organizational   gard, “The Dawn of Digital HR,”
                       Management Thought, 6th ed.   3678511/ebay-amex-baker-hughes-   Psychology (September 2001):   Business Finance, October 2003,
                       (Hoboken, NJ: John  Wiley &   layoffs/, January 22, 2015.  253–77.              55–59; and J. Hoekstra, “Three
                       Sons, 2009), 198–200; “Building     9. Ibid.       17.  See J. Merritt, “Improv at the In-  in One,”  Online Learning vol. 5
                       Better Organizations: Industrial-   10.  J. Mooney, “Pre-Employment   terview,”  BusinessWeek, February   (2001): 28–32.
                       Organizational Psychology in   Testing on the Internet: Put Can-  3, 2003, 63; P. J.  Taylor and B.    24.  See, for instance, E. G.  Tripp,
                       the Workplace,”  Society for In-  didates a Click Away and Hire at   Small,  “Asking Applicants  What     “Aging Aircraft and Coming Regu-
                       dustrial and Organizational Psy-  Modem Speed,” Public Personnel   They Would  Do  versus What   lations: Political and Media Pres-
                       chology, www.siop.org (July 13,   Management, Spring 2002, 41–52.  They Did Do:  A Meta-Analysis   sures Have Encouraged the FAA to
                       2009); M. Munsterberg,  Hugo    11.  L. Weber and E. Dwoskin, “As Per-  Comparison of Situation and   Expand Its Pursuit of Real and Per-
                       Munsterberg: His Life and Work   sonality Tests Multiply, Employers   Past Behavior Employment In-  ceived Problems of Older Aircraft
                       (New  York:  Appleton-Century-  Are Split,”  Wall Street Journal,   terview Questions,”  Journal of   and Their Systems. Operators Will
                       Crofts, 1922); and H. Munster-  September 30, 2014, A1+.  Occupational and Organizational   Pay,”  Business and Commercial
                       berg,  Psychology and Industrial    12.  See, for instance, R. D. Arvey and   Psychology  (September  2002):   Aviation, March 2001, 68–75.
                       Efficiency (Boston: Houghton   J. E. Campion, “The Employment   277–95; S. D. Mauer, “A Practitio-   25.  “A&S Interview: Sully’s  Tale,”
                       Mifflin Company, 1913).    Interview:  A  Summary  and  Re-  ner-Based Analysis of Interviewer   Air & Space Magazine, www.
                      3.  M.  Wilson, “Hooters Manager   view of Recent Research,” Person-  Job Expertise and Scale Format as   airspacemag.com (February 18,
                       Asks Waitress to Wear a Wig af-  nel Psychology, Summer 1982,   Contextual Factors in Situational   2009); A. Altman,  “Chesley  B.
                       ter Brain Surgery,” http://www.  281–322; and M. M. Harris, “Re-  Interviews,”  Personnel  Psychol-  Sullenberger III,”  Time, www.
                       hrcommunication.com/Main/  considering the Employment In-  ogy, Summer 2002, 307–28; and   time.com (January 16, 2009);
                       Articles/Hooters_manager_asks_  terview: A Review of Recent Lit-  J. M. Barclay, “Improving Selec-  and K. Burke, P. Donohue, and
                       waitress_to_wear_a_wig_after_   erature and Suggestions for Future   tion Interviews with Structure:   C.  Siemaszko,  “US Airways Air-
                       8781.aspx, April  10,  2013; A.   Research,” Personnel Psychology,   Organizations’ Use of Behavioral   plane Crashes in Hudson River—
                       Langfield, “Hooters Sued by   Winter 1989, 691–726; J. H. Prag-  Interviews,” Personnel Review 30,   Hero Pilot Chesley Sullenberger
                       Former  Waitress in Dispute over   er, “Nasty or Nice: 56-Question   no. 1 (2001): 81–95.  III  Saves All Aboard,”  New York
                       Wig,” NBC News, http://www.  Quiz,” Wall Street Journal, Febru-   18.  J. Merritt, “Improv at the Inter-  Daily News, www.nydailynews.
                       cnbc.com/id/100627864, April  9,   ary 22, 2000, A4; and M. K. Zach-  view,” 63.  com (January 16, 2009).
                       2013; and R. Patrick, “Suit Says   ary, “Labor Law for Supervisors,”    19.  S. H. Applebaum and M. Donia,    26.  C. S. Duncan, J. D. Selby-Lucas,
                       Hooters Waitress Forced out after   Supervision, March 2001, 23–26.  “The Realistic Downsizing Pre-  and  W. Swart, “Linking Organi-
                       Surgery,” St. Louis Post Dispatch,    13.  See, for instance, G. Nicholsen,   view: A Management Intervention   zational Goals  and  Objectives  to
                       http://www.stltoday.com/news/  “Screen and Glean: Good Screen-  in the Prevention of Survivor Syn-  Employee Performance: A Quan-
                       local/crime-and-courts/suit-says-  ing and Background Checks Help   drome (Part II),” Career Develop-  titative Perspective,”  Journal of
                       hooters-waitress-forced-out-after-  Make the Right Match for Every   ment International, January 2001,   American  Academy of Business
                       surgery/article_db861563-d08b-  Open Position,” Workforce, Octo-  5–19.         (March 2002): 314–18.
                       5cb7-9cc9-91150b39351b.html,   ber 2000, 70.       20.  D. Zielinski, “Effective  Assess-   27.  “Training Expenditures,” Training
                       April 6, 2013.          14.  R. A. Posthuma, F. P. Morgeson,   ments,”  HRMagazine, January   (November–December 2010): 19.
                      4.  P. W. Tam and S. Woo, “Talent War   and M.  A. Campion, “Beyond   2011, 61–64; W. L. Gardner, B. J.    28.  R. Langlois, “Fairmont Hotels:
                       Crunches Start-Ups,”  Wall Street   Employment Interview Validity: A   Reithel, R. T. Foley, C. C. Cogliser,   Business Strategy Starts with
                       Journal, February 28, 2011, B1+;   Comprehensive  Narrative  Review   and F. O. Walumbwa, “Attraction   People,”  Canadian HR Reporter,
                       and C.  Tuna, “Many Companies   of  Recent Research  and  Trends   to Organizational Culture Profiles:   November 5, 2001, 19.
                       Hire as  They Fire,”  Wall Street   Over Time,”  Personnel Psychol-  Effects of Realistic Recruitment    29.  M. Dalahoussaye, “Show Me
                       Journal, May 11, 2009, B6.  ogy, Spring 2002, 1–81.   and Vertical  and  Horizontal  Indi-  the Results,”  Training (March
                      5.  J.  J. Salopek, “Employee Refer-   15.  A. I. Huffcutt, J. M. Conway, P. L.   vidualism-Collectivism,” Manage-  2002): 28.
                       rals Remain a Recruiter’s Best   Roth, and N. J. Stone, “Identifica-  ment Communication Quarterly,    30.  A.  Tziner, C. Joanis, and K. R.
                       Friend,”   Workforce  Manage-  tion and Meta-Analysis  Assess-  February 2009, 437–72; and S.   Murphy, “A Comparison of Three
                       ment  Online,  December 2010;  L.   ment of Psychological Constructs   L. Premack and J. P. Wanous, “A   Methods of Performance Apprais-
                       G.  Klaff,  “New  Internal  Hiring   Measured in Employment Inter-  Meta-Analysis of Realistic Job   al with Regard to Goal Properties,
                       Systems Reduce Cost and Boost   views,”  Journal of  Applied Psy-  Preview Experiments,” Journal of   Goal  Perception,  and  Rate  Satis-
                       Morale,” Workforce Management,   chology (October 2001): 897–913;   Applied Psychology (November   faction,” Group and Organization
                       March 2004, 76–79; M. N. Marti-  and A. I. Huffcutt, J. A. Weekley,   1985): 706–20.  Management, June 2000, 175–90;
                       nez, “The Headhunter Within,” HR   W. H. Wiesner, T. G. Degroot, and    21.  C. Garvey, “The  Whirlwind of a   and  T.  W. Kent and  T. J. Davis,
                       Magazine,  August 2001, 48–55;   C. Jones, “Comparison of Situa-  New  Job,”  HR  Magazine,  June   “Using Retranslation to Develop
                       “Even Non-Recruiting Companies   tional and Behavioral Description   2001, 110–18.  Operational  Anchored Scales to
                       Must Maintain Hiring Networks,”   Interview Questions for Higher-   22.  B. P. Sunoo, “Results-Oriented   Assess the Motivational Context
                       HR Focus, November 2001, 8; and   Level Positions,”  Personnel Psy-  Customer  Service  Training,”  of Jobs,”  International Journal
                       L. Greenhalgh,  A.  T. Lawrence,   chology, Autumn 2001, 619–44.  Workforce (May 2001): 84–90.  of Management (March 2002):
                       and  R. I. Sutton,  “Determinants    16.  See C. H. Middendorf and  T. H.    23.  Technology and the Manager’s Job   10–16.
                       of  Work Force Reduction Strate-  Macan, “Note-Taking in the Em-  box based on D. Zielinski, “Refer-   31.  See also C.  A. Ramus and U.
                       gies in Declining Organizations,”   ployment Interview: Effects on   ral Booster,” HR Magazine, March   Steger, “The Roles of Supervi-
                       Academy of Management Review,   Recall and Judgments,” Journal of   2013, 63–65; B. Horovitz, “Tweet   sory Support Behaviors and En-
                       April 1988, 241–54.        Applied Psychology (April 2002):   for  This Job—And It Could Be   vironmental Policy in Employee
                      6.  J.  J. Salopek, “Employee Refer-  293–303;  D.  Butcher,  “The Inter-  Yours,” USA Today, February 18,   ‘Ecoinitiatives’ at Leading-Edge
                       rals Remain a Recruiter’s Best   view Rights and  Wrongs,”  Man-  2013,  A 4; “Action Items,”  HR   European Companies,”  Academy
                       Friend”;  “Employee  Referral  agement Today, April 2002, 4; P.   Magazine, January 2013, 33–35;   of Management Journal (August
                       Programs: Highly Qualified New   L. Roth, C. H. Can Iddekinge, A.   B. Roberts, “From E-Learning to   2000): 605–26.
                       Hires Who Stick Around,” Cana-  I. Huffcutt, C. E. Eidson, and P.   Mobile Learning,” HR Magazine,    32.  See R. de  Andrés, J. L. Garcia-
                       dian HR Reporter, June 4, 2001,   Bobko, “Corrections for Range   August 2012, 61–65; D. Zielinski,   Lapresta, and J. GonzálezPachón,
                       21; and C. Lachnit, “Employee   Restriction in Structured Interview   “Effective  Assessments”; R. E.   “Performance Appraisal  Based
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257