Page 433 - Krugmans Economics for AP Text Book_Neat
P. 433

their economic growth suffers due to corruption among the government officials who
                                                                                         Long - run economic growth is
             should be enforcing the law. For example, until 1991 the Indian government imposed
                                                                                         sustainable if it can continue in the
             many bureaucratic restrictions on businesses, which often had to bribe government of-
                                                                                         face of the limited supply of natural
             ficials to get approval for even routine activities—a tax on business, in effect. Econo-  resources and the impact of growth
             mists have argued that a reduction in this burden of corruption is one reason Indian  on the environment.
             growth has been much faster in recent years than it was in the first 40 years after India
             gained independence in 1947.
               Even when governments aren’t corrupt, excessive government intervention can be a
             brake on economic growth. If large parts of the economy are supported by government                       Section 7 Economic Growth and Productivity
             subsidies, protected from imports, or otherwise insulated from competition, productiv-
             ity tends to suffer because of a lack of incentives. As we saw in Module 38, excessive gov-
             ernment intervention is one often -cited explanation for slow growth in Latin America.


             Is World Growth Sustainable?

             Earlier we described the views of Thomas Malthus, the nineteenth-century economist
             who warned that the pressure of population growth would tend to limit the standard of
             living. Malthus was right—about the past: for around 58 centuries, from the origins of civ-
             ilization until his own time, limited land supplies effectively prevented any large rise in
             real incomes per capita. Since then, however, technological progress and rapid accumula-
             tion of physical and human capital have allowed the world to defy Malthusian pessimism.
               But will this always be the case? Some skeptics have expressed doubt about whether
             long -run economic growth is sustainable—whether it can continue in the face of the
             limited supply of natural resources and the impact of growth on the environment.
             Natural Resources and Growth, Revisited

             In 1972, a group of scientists called the Club of Rome made a big splash with a book ti-
             tled The Limits to Growth, which argued that long -run economic growth wasn’t sustain-
             able due to limited supplies of nonrenewable resources such as oil and natural gas.
             These “neo - Malthusian” concerns at first seemed to be validated by a sharp rise in re-
             source prices in the 1970s, then came to seem foolish when resource prices fell sharply
             in the 1980s. After 2005, however, resource prices rose sharply again, leading to re-
             newed concern about resource limitations to growth. Figure 39.1 shows the real price




                figure 39.1

                The Real Price of Oil,         Real domestic
                1949–2008                       U.S. oil price
                                               (2000 dollars,
                The real price of natural resources, like  per barrel)
                oil, rose dramatically in the 1970s and  $80
                then fell just as dramatically in the
                1980s. Since 2005, however, the real     70
                prices of natural resources have soared.  60
                Source: Energy Information Administration.  50
                                                         40
                                                         30
                                                         20
                                                         10

                                                         1949  1960  1970  1980  1990  2000  2008

                                                                                       Year



                                        module 39      Growth Policy: Why Economic Growth Rates Differ          391
   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438