Page 333 - Records of Bahrain (5) (i)_Neat
P. 333

Interest of oil companies in llawar Island     321

      e.u. c. 1.18.                           (Scj                      . ‘X-'f
           TELEPHONE I NATIONAL 1111                              CODES,
                                                             BENTLEY'S SECOND PHRASE   Si
           >.0 TELEGRAMS i               < * T ■» • "
       -NL^O^ONCESS. MNJQUARE, LONDON      !-.U, J     BENTLEY'S COMPLETE PHRASE WITH OIL SUPPLEMENT
        •rij0^liGN l PETCONCEIS, LONDON                           LOMBARD
    <0^                               i
               PETROLEUM CONCESSIONS LIMITED

      OIRECTORS i
      Lord Cidmin, G.C.M.G. (Chairman)             CITY-GATE HOUSE
      G. L(|'i.|onn
      R. Ciyrol, O S.O., O.S.C. (frlnrh)
      W. Fiiitr, C.D.E.                                   FINSBURY SQUARE
      C. S. Gulb*"Vlin (farmttlf Armtnlan)   pc.26/56
       S.G
      tuns,* LfOwIcM
       D.A
      I. A. Me of (f/WcPl)                                       LONDON • E.C.2
      H. G. S.ld.l (UJ.AJ
      R.W. S.II.ri                                         50th June, I959.
      J. Skllioi
                   The Under Secretary of
                   State for India,
                   Whitehall,
                   S.W. 1.
                   Sir,
                        It is desired to recall certain correspondence
                   which passed between the India Office and this-
                   Company in 195b on the subject of the allegiance
                   or ownership of the Hawar group of islands situated
                   west - and within the territorial waters - of the
                   Qatar Peninsula.

            2.          A letter No. PZ.4582/50 of July 14th 195b, from
            M      Mr. J.C. Walton to Mr. J. Skliros states:    "On the
      f<('\
                   basis of the evidence at present before His Majesty’s
                   Government, it appears to them that Hav/ar belongs to
                   the Shaikh of Bahrain, and that the burden of
                   disproving his claim would lie on any other potential
                   claimant11.  A subsequent letter, dated September 14th,
                   from Mr. M.C. Clauson to Mr. S.H. Longrlgg calls
                   particular attention to "the limited nature" of this
                   decision.   It says: "It is important that the
                   Company should clearly understand that His Majesty’s
                   Government’s position is as stated in the last
                   sentence of that letter" (i.e., Mr. Walton’s letter
                   above-quoted) "namely, that on the basis of the
                   evidence at present before them it appears to them
                   that Hav/ar belongs to the Shaikh of Bahrain and that
                       burden of disproving his claim would lie on any
           C§J3RA/V^ther potential claimant. Perhaps you will be good
                      \
             11II.'030  ;
      J    1
       V               /
        igTAOiV.     /
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338