Page 65 - نموذج

462 16 Writing Proposals

Organizing the project by tasks
makes it easy for the writers
to present a Gantt chart. In Memo to Dr. Jill Bremerton October 6, 2011 Page 6
addition, the task organization
will help the writers stay on track Schedule
if the proposal is approved and Figure 1 is a schedule of the tasks we would complete for this project.
they continue their research.
Tasks Date of Tasks (by Weeks)
each task is presented with Task 1: Research clicker use
parallel grammar, which helps Task 2: Research instructor attitudes
make the writers seem careful Task 3: Research student attitudes
and professional. Task 4: Research lecture halls
Task 5: Research computer environment
some tasks overlap in time: Task 6: Prepare report
researchers often work on 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12
several tasks simultaneously. Oct. Nov. Dec.
The Tech Tip on p. 455 explains Figure 1. Schedule of Project Tasks
how to create a Gantt chart.

Experience
We are academically successful students who are qualified to perform this research and
present our findings and recommendation:
The writers summarize their • Jeremy Elkins, Co-chair of the Student Affairs Advisory Committee at CMSU, is a
credentials. strong credentials technical-communication major in the English Department and an honor student each of
his three years at CMSU. He has used clickers in two of his courses.
help reinforce the writers’ • Eloise Carruthers, Co-chair of the Student Affairs Advisory Committee, is a civil-
professionalism. engineering major and a CMSU Top Ten Scholar. She has studied statistics in several
courses and is an experienced writer of Web-based questionnaires.
This proposal lacks a budget.
Because the writers are References
students, they are being
compensated with internship Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-
practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1): 9–20. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
credits that dr. Bremerton is Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an elec-
overseeing.
tronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81–94.
This list of references follows Ohio State University. (2005). Committee on classroom response systems: Final report,
March 2, 2005. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from http://lt.osu.edu/assets
the aPa documentation /resources/clickers/crsfinalreport.pdf
style, which is discussed in Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2006). Using electronic voting systems in lectures.
appendix, Part B, p. 670. The Retrieved September 5, 2011, from www.ucl.ac.uk/learningtechnology/examples
aPa documentation system /ElectronicVotingSystems.pdf
calls for References to begin Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. (2010). Classroom response systems
a new page. Check with your (“clickers”). Retrieved September 3, 2011, from www.vanderbilt.edu/cft/resources
instructor. /teaching_resources/technology/crs.htm

16_MAR_67948_Ch16_439-465.indd 462 11/29/11 3:35 PM