Page 50 - Chapter One
P. 50

18  The Management Shift




          5. Adopting a “scientific model” of research based on partialization of analy-
             sis, where a phenomenon is analyzed as an isolated part, excluding con-
             sideration of human choice and intentions (leading to a denial of ethical
             considerations), and use of strict assumptions and deductive reasoning.
             The use of a scientific method in the analysis of a social phenomenon has
             led not only to a loss of morality but also to a loss of a common sense 80
                                                      81
          6. Adopting a pessimistic “liberalism”- based ideology  focused on solving

             the negative problem of restricting the social costs arising from human

             imperfections, and theory in the social science tends to be  self- fulfilling,
             so managers start behaving according to the theory, leading to patholo-
             gies in management behavior
          7. Focusing on the scholarship of discovery (research), and marginalizing
             the scholarship of integration (synthesis), the scholarship of practice
             (application), and the scholarship of teaching (pedagogy) 82
          8. Predominantly adopting a “ Newton- style” management based on the

             Newtonian machine metaphor where all parts of an organization are
             viewed (and managed) in isolation instead of more holistic approaches
             based on complexity theory and other related theories
          9. Prioritizing neoclassical economics focused on the allocation of resources
             for profit maximization, neglecting the systemic view and context in
             which business operates.

          Table 1.3 shows a summary of theories, concepts and terms used within
          traditional and new management paradigms.
          A number of leading management thinkers have criticized the current
          state of management research and pedagogy, including Porter and
                   83
                                                                     86
                                                 85
                           84
          McKibbin,  Leavitt,  Mintzberg and Gosling,  and Pfeffer and Fong.
          They argue that there is a lack of impact of management research on
          management practice as well as a lack of effectiveness of management
          education for business performance of students. Even more importantly,
          Ghoshal  argues that outdated management paradigms and academic
                 87
          research related to the conduct of business and management have had
          some very negative influences on the practice of management, and by
          propagating ideologically inspired amoral theories, business schools have
          freed their students from any sense of moral responsibility.
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55