Page 29 - Impact of WfH study report _SCOPE-ILO_Neat
P. 29

1.  Did the respondent work from home (WfH) following COVID-19 declared
                      pandemic and subsequent lockdowns? (Q5)


                        Worked from Home                             Continuing to          No of
                          (WfH) following           No of          work from home       Respondents
                         COVID-19 declared      Respondents          (at the time of
                             pandemic                                   Survey)
                                 Yes            939 (47.69%)
                                                                          Yes             91 (4.62%)

                                 No             201 (10.21%)
                                                                           No           1451 (73.69%)

                          Only for a limited    829 (42.10%)         Partially/ On a
                                                                                        427 (21.69%)
                               duration                             ROTA i.e. Roster
                                                                         Basis
                               TOTAL                1969                TOTAL                1969
                       Source: SCOPE-ILO Online Survey, 2020



                   At  the  time  of  the  Survey,  only  a  marginal  percentage  of  women  i.e.  4.62%  were
                   continuing to work from home. Most had returned to office i.e. 1451 (73.69%) women
                   executives were back at their respective offices; 427, following a roster system were
                   going to office as per office directives.

                   Immediately  though,  following  the  COVID-19  declared  pandemic  and  subsequent
                                                  21
                   lockdowns, 89.79 % (n= 1768)  experienced working from home; of these, nearly
                   42.10% (n=829) worked from home only for a limited duration. The ones who could
                   not or did not avail of the WfH, were mostly working on-sites/far-off locations.
                   For  respondents  who  worked  from  home  only  for  a  limited  duration,  the  duration
                   ranged from one/two weeks or one month or maximum 3 months (mostly, March –May
                   2020; for some it was August/September 2020). For a few others, the period went
                   beyond 3 months.  The duration depended on company’s directives, after evaluating
                   organisational requirements.



                  2.  Adjusting to the new norm of Working from Home (WfH) following COVID
                      19 pandemic? (Q7)

                   As  to  the  question  how  they  adjusted  to  the  new  norm  of WfH  irrespective  of  the
                   duration, there was a mixed response.  35.46% (n=695) indicated that they adjusted
                   very well to the new norm; for 44  people (2.24%) they did not have to adjust as even
                   prior to COVID they had arrangements to work from home (like going to office on
                   limited/alternate days). For around 55% of respondents, they found their adjusting to



                   21  N= Number of respondents citing the option. The n=number in parentheses has been used
                   throughout this chapter.
                                                                                                    15
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34