Page 25 - Impact of WfH study report _SCOPE-ILO_Neat
P. 25

therefore did not require the name of individuals participating. This facilitated without
                   any intimidation, a free and frank participation from all participants in the study.



                   2.5 Reliability of the study

                   The strongest reliability factor is the record number of responses the study received,
                   and the wide cross section of KIIs, which gives credibility to the study.

                   The study provided an opportunity not only to the E4–E9 women employees in PSEs
                   to express their views but it also provided an opportunity to the senior management
                   and decision makers in the PSEs – comprising both men and women, to  share their
                   views  on  the  WfH  arrangement  from  a  company  as  well  as  employees’  welfare
                   perspective.

                   For SCOPE-ILO, the study revealed the different facets of the WfH arrangement in
                   PSEs. It also led to recommendations followed by a set of guidelines derived from the
                   discursive  and  interactive  methods,  as  the  way  forward.  The  guidelines  can  help
                   organizations to come up with gender sensitive not necessarily gender neutral policies.
                   It  is  hoped  that  the  suggested  guidelines  besides  SCOPE  will be  taken  up by  the
                   network of champions to disseminate within their own organisations, and other PSEs,
                   for  a  better  and  comprehensive  WfH  policies  in  India’s  PSEs.  The  SCOPE
                   Management has also reiterated that it will discuss the study recommendations among
                   its member PSEs; besides collaborating further with ILO for review, evaluation and
                   adaptation of WfH in PSEs taking into account prevailing practices in private sector as
                   well as best global practices.

                   ---



                   References



                   Cascio,  W.  F.  (2000).  Managing  a  virtual  workplace.  Academy  of  Management
                   Executive,                                  14                                 (3);
                   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246755382_Managing_A_Virtual_Workplac
                   e

                   Costa,  K.,  &  Tumagole,  B.  (2020).  A  Pragmatic  Inquiry  into  Employee's  Lived
                   Experiences     in   relation   to   COVID-19    Lockdown      in   South    Africa;
                   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341567108_A_Pragmatic_Inquiry_into_Em
                   ployee's_Lived_Experiences_in_relation_to_COVID-19_Lockdown_in_South_Africa


                   Dingel, J. I., and B. Neiman. 2020. “How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home?” National
                   Bureau     of    Economic     Research     (NBER),     Working    Paper     26948;
                   https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26948/w26948.pdf

                   Eddleston,  K.  A.,  &  Mulki,  J.  (2017).  Toward  understanding  remote  workers’
                   management  of  work–family  boundaries:  The  complexity  of  workplace
                                                                                                    11
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30