Page 22 - Impact of WfH study report _SCOPE-ILO_Neat

study was being conducted at an opportune time, when many PSEs were either
developing/drafting their WfH policies; or reviewing their existing policies. In addition,
it was appreciated that recommendations were to be drawn out of survey responses
as well as the KIIs; and guidelines were to be proposed based on the study findings.
It would therefore have greater acknowledgement and acceptance from PSEs; and
they could consider integrating and adapting what is proposed, in line with their
organisational requirements.

Study Methods and Tools

TOOLS RESPONDENTS PURPOSE

A. Quantitative

o E4-E9 Women
13
i. Surveys To find out women executives’ experiences and
Executives in PSEs
their views on the WfH arrangement –
challenges, effectiveness, appraisals,
communication, benefits, etc. - as a result of
COVID and subsequent lockdowns.

B. Qualitative

o Chairman cum
14
ii. KIIs To discuss and find out:
Managing Directors
(CMDs), PSEs
o Head – Human a) the changes brought in or made by the
company to shift to a “work from home”
Resources (HR) Unit
o Supervisor/Team (WfH) work arrangement for its workforce;
Leader of a Unit and were these changes effective;
o Women in Senior b) organizational efforts or initiatives in
Management and facilitating its workforce particularly women
executives to work from home;
Decision Making c) organizational assessment of the
Position
o Director General (DG), performance of women executives WfH
home during COVID and subsequent
SCOPE
lockdowns;

13 Annexure IV: Survey Questionnaire. The questionnaire was formulated in consultation
with SCOPE and inputs from network of champions. It was administered via Survey Monkey
(https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ILOSCOPE-WfH). SCOPE shared the survey link with its
201 member organisations.
14 Annexure V: KIIs Checklist Questions (with inputs from SCOPE Taskforce).
8