Page 55 - Impact of WfH study report _SCOPE-ILO_Neat
P. 55
5.2 Hearing Womens Voices
WHAT WOMEN SAID
Drawing from their COVID induced work from home experience, women cutting across
PSEs, shared multiple anecdotes that acts as an eye-opener to various facets of a
work from home arrangement. WfH cannot simply be bracketed into a good or a bad
option. Underlying a good or a bad option, there are factors at play. Therefore, it is
44
interesting to hear the womens voices. Some of them are captured here.
Workplace is a competitive Space
- Work place is a competitive space; absence or lack of it, is not good for
professional grooming. I therefore believe a balance between the two that is,
work from office (WfO) and Work from home (WfH) is best. Moreover, in an
office set up, we interact, meet and learn from diverse group of people; in a
work from home, this interaction is mostly limited to peers (Respondent, Power
Grid Corporation of India Limited).
WfH gives less time for idle biases
- It kept me away from office gossips and politics. There was better utilization of
overall available time on daily basis (Respondent, Indian Oil Corporation
Limited).
- There was better time management - meetings could be started and ended
within planned timelines without cascading effect on other planned activities. In
view of online meetings, wait period for people to assemble for the meeting was
bare minimum. Relevant people attended the meetings; discussions and
approvals were to the point and with lesser digressions (Respondent,
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited).
WfH without self-discipline and accountability is not that easy
- Set hours not stretched hours while WfH. Even if the company has not
issued a guideline or prescribed a rule, it is best to set specific office time for
oneself while working from home. If we do not fix a set time for work, in all
likelihood family members may feel that she is home all the time, so she can
do all the house work. They wont be able to comprehend the requirements of
our job (KII-NLC India Limited).
44 Source: SCOPE-ILO Survey, 2020.
41