Page 128 - U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
P. 128

A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Second Edition.


            339    See, e.g., ICC Rules on Combating Corruption, supra   358   15  U.S.C.  §§  78dd-2(g)(1)(A),  78dd-3(e)(1)(A),
            note 326, at 7.                                     78ff(c)(1)(A).
            340    See, e.g., U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 8B2.1(b)(5)(C)   359   15  U.S.C.  §§  78dd-2(g)(2)(A),  78dd-3(e)(2)(A),
            (2018); Compliance 101, supra note 318, at 30-33.   78ff(c)(2)(A); 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b)(3), (e) (fine provision that
                                                                supersedes FCPA-specific fine provisions).
            341    See  U.S.  Sentencing  Guidelines  §  8B2.1(b)(5)(B)
            (2018) (“The organization shall take reasonable steps . . . to   360   15 U.S.C. § 78ff(a).
            evaluate periodically the effectiveness of the organization’s
            compliance and ethics program.”).                   361     Id.

            342    See, e.g.,  Compliance  101,  supra  note  318,  at  60-  362   18  U.S.C.  §  3571(d);  see  Southern Union  v.  United
            61;  The  Ethics  and  Compliance  Handbook,  supra  note  334,   States, 132 S. Ct. 2344, 2350-51 & n.4 (2012).
            at 155-60; Business Principles for Countering Bribery, supra
            note 326, at 14.                                    363     15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-2(g)(3), 78dd-3(e)(3), 78ff(c)(3).

            343    See, e.g.,  Michael  M.  Mannix  and  David  S.  Black.,   364   The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines are promulgated by
            Compliance Issues in M&A: Performing Diligence on the Target’s   the U.S. Sentencing Commission:
            Ethics  and Compliance Program  at  5.71-5.81,  in Society of
            Corporate Compliance and Ethics, The Complete Compliance    The United States Sentencing  Commission
            and Ethics Manual (2011).                                   (“Commission”)  is  an  independent  agency  in
                                                                        the judicial branch composed of seven voting
            344    Complaint, SEC v. Syncor International Corp., No. 02-  and  two  non-voting  ex-officio members. Its
            cv-2421 (D.D.C. Dec. 10, 2002), ECF No. 1, available at http://  principal  purpose  is  to  establish  sentencing
            www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp17887.htm;            policies and practices for the federal criminal
            Criminal Information, United States v. Syncor Taiwan, Inc., No.   justice  system  that  will  assure  the  ends  of
            02-cr-1244  (C.D.  Cal.  Dec.  5,  2002),  ECF  No.  1,  available  at   justice  by  promulgating  detailed  guidelines
            https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/case/united-states-v-  prescribing  the appropriate sentences for
            syncor-taiwan-inc-court-docket-number-02-cr-1244-svw.       offenders  convicted  of  federal  crimes.  The
                                                                        guidelines and policy statements promulgated
            345    U.S. Dept. of Justice, FCPA Op. Release 08-02 (June   by  the  Commission  are issued  pursuant  to
            13, 2008), available at http://justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/  Section 994(a) of Title 28, United States Code.
            opinion/2008/0802.pdf.
                                                                U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 1A1.1 (2018).
            346    Complaint, SEC v. Rae Sys., Inc., supra note 92; Non-
            Pros. Agreement, In re Rae Sys. Inc., supra note 92.  365   Id. at ch. 3-5.

            347    See Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs,   366   Id. § 2C1.1.
            supra note 319.
                                                                367     Id. § 2C1.1(b).
            348    U.S.  Dept.  of  Commerce,  Business  Ethics:  A
            Manual for Managing  a  Responsible  Business  Enterprise    368   Id. § 3B1.1.
            in  Emerging Market Economies (2004), available at https://
            legacy.trade.gov/goodgovernance/adobe/bem_manual.pdf.  369   Id. at ch. 4, § 5A.
            349    U.S.  Dept.  of  State,  Fighting  Global  Corruption:   370   Id. § 2B1.1(b)(10)(B), 2B1.1(b)(18)(A).
            Business  Risk  Management  (2d  ed.  2001),  available  at
            http://wgfacml.asa.gov.eg/en/anticorrupcion/USA/EU%20  371   Id. § 8C2.4 (a).
            fighting%20against%20corruption.usa%202001-2003.pdf.
                                                                372     Id. § 8C2.5.
            350    See Harmonising Anti-Corruption Compliance, supra
            note  318,  at  46  (“Anti-corruption  compliance  is  becoming   373   Id. § 8C2.5(f), 8C2.5(g).
            more and more harmonised worldwide.”).
                                                                374     DOJ  has  exercised  this  civil  authority  in  limited
            351    OECD Good Practice Guidance, supra note 326.  circumstances in the last thirty years. See, e.g., United States
                                                                & SEC v. KPMG  Siddharta Siddharta & Harsono,  et al.,  No.
            352    APEC Anti-corruption Code, supra note 326.   01-cv-3105  (S.D.  Tex.  2001)  (entry  of  injunction  barring
                                                                company from future FCPA violations based on allegations
            353    ICC Rules on Combating Corruption, supra note 326.  that company paid bribes to Indonesian tax official in order
                                                                to  reduce  the  company’s  tax  assessment);  United States v.
            354    Business  Principles  for  Countering  Bribery,  supra   Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., No. 99-cv-12566 (D. Mass. 1999) (entry
            note 326.                                           of  injunction  barring  company  from  future  FCPA  violations
                                                                and requiring maintenance of compliance program based on
            355    The Ten Principles, supra note 326.          allegations that it paid excessive marketing and promotional
                                                                expenses such as airfare, travel expenses, and per diem to
            356    Integrity Compliance Guidelines, supra note 326.  an Egyptian official and his family); United States v. American
                                                                Totalisator Co. Inc.,  No.  93-cv-161  (D.  Md.  1993)  (entry  of
            357    Partnering Against Corruption, supra note 326.  injunction  barring  company  from  future  FCPA  violations
                                                                                                                     120
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133