Page 125 - U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
P. 125

A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Second Edition.


            foreign  officials  may  not  be  prosecuted  under  18  U.S.C.     Enrique  Rincon-Fernandez,  No.  15-cr-654  (S.D.  Tex.  June  15,
            § 371 for conspiring to violate the FCPA.”). Foreign officials,   2016),  ECF  No.  61,  available  at  https://www.justice.gov/
            however, can be charged with violating the FCPA when the   criminal-fraud/file/878951/download; Plea Agreement, United
            foreign official acts as an intermediary of a bribe payment.     States v. Leo Winston Smith, No. 07-cr-69 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2009),
            See, e.g.,  Information,  United States v. Basu,  No.  02-cr-475   ECF  No.  89,  available  at  https://www.justice.gov/sites/
            (D.D.C. Nov. 26, 2002) (World Bank employee charged with   default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2011/02/16/09-03-
            wire fraud and FCPA violations for facilitating bribe payments   09smithl-plea-agree.pdf;  Criminal  Information,  United
            to  another  World  Bank  official  and  Kenyan  government   States v. Titan Corp., supra note 190.
            official),  available at  http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/
            fcpa/cases/basu/11-26-02basu-info.pdf;  Information,  United   295   See JM § 9-27.000.
            States v. Sengupta, No. 02-cr-40 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2002), available
            at  https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/  296   See JM § 9-27.420 (setting forth considerations to be
            legacy/2011/02/16/01-30-02sengupta-info.pdf.        weighed when determining whether it would be appropriate
                                                                to enter into plea agreement).
            288    See, e.g., Judgments, United States v. Esquenazi, supra
            note 43, ECF Nos. 182, 816, 824 (judgments against foreign   297   See JM § 9-28.000 et seq.
            official defendants).
                                                                298     See  JM  §  9-28.710  (discussing  attorney-client  and
            289    Criminal Information, United States v. SSI Int’l, supra   work product protections).
            note 243 (alleging violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1346); Plea
            Agreement, United States v. SSI Int’l, supra note 243, (Oct. 10,   299   FCPA  Corporate  Enforcement  Policy,  available at
            2006), available at https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/  https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/838416/
            criminal-fraud/legacy/2011/02/16/10-10-06ssi-fareast-plea.  download.
            pdf.
                                                                300     Id.
            290    See Ex-Im Bank, Form of Exporter’s Certificate, EIB
            15-04  (May  2019),  available  at    https://www.exim.gov/sites/  301   See, e.g.,  DOJ  Declination  Letter,  Cognizant
            default/files/forms/eib15-04_0.pdf.                 Technology Solutions Corporation (Feb. 13, 2019), available
                                                                at   https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1132666/
            291    See 18 U.S.C. § 1001.                        download; DOJ Declination Letter, Insurance Corporation of
                                                                Barbados Limited (Aug. 23, 2018), available at https://www.
            292    22 C.F.R. §§ 130.2, 130.9.                   justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/file/1089626/download;  DOJ
                                                                Declination Letter, Guralp Systems Limited (Aug. 20, 2018),
            293    For example, in United States v. BAE Systems plc, BAE   available  at  https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/
            pleaded  guilty  to conspiring  to defraud  the United  States   file/1088621/download.
            by  impairing  and  impeding  its  lawful  functions,  to  making
            false  statements  about  its  FCPA  compliance  program,  and   302   See FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, supra note 299.
            to violating the AECA and ITAR. BAE paid a $400 million fine
            and agreed to an independent corporate monitor to ensure   303   Id.
            compliance with applicable anti-corruption and export control
            laws. Criminal Information and Plea Agreement, United States   304   Id.
            v. BAE Sys. plc, No. 10-cr-35 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2010), ECF Nos.
            1,  8,  available at  https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/  305   See Plea Agreement, United States v. Alstom S.A., supra
            criminal-fraud/legacy/2011/02/16/02-01-10baesystems-info.  note 194; Criminal Information, United States v. Marubeni Corp.,
            pdf and  https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-  Press  Release,  U.S.  Dept.  of  Justice,  Marubeni  Corporation
            fraud/legacy/2011/02/16/03-01-10baesystems-plea-agree.  Agrees to Plead Guilty to Foreign Bribery Charges and to Pay
            pdf. In an action based on the same underlying facts as the   an $88 Million Fine, available at https://www.justice.gov/
            criminal guilty plea, BAE entered a civil settlement with the   opa/pr/marubeni-corporation-agrees-plead-guilty-
            Directorate of Defense Trade Controls for violations of AECA   foreign-bribery-charges-and-pay-88-million-fine.
            and ITAR, including over 2500 ITAR violations that included
            a  failure  to  report  the  payment  of  fees  or  commissions   306   See, e.g., DOJ Declination Letter, Dun & Bradstreet
            associated with defense transactions and failure to maintain   Corp. (Apr. 23, 2018), available at https://www.justice.gov/
            records involving ITAR-controlled transactions. BAE paid $79   criminal-fraud/file/1055401/download;  Cease-and-Desist
            million  in  penalties,  and  the  State  Department  imposed  a   Order,  In  the Matter of  The Dun &  Bradstreet Corp.,  Admin.
            “policy of denial” for export licenses on three BAE subsidiaries   Proc. 3-18446 (Apr. 23, 2018), available at https://www.sec.
            involved in the wrongful conduct. Press Release, BAE Systems   gov/litigation/admin/2018/34-83088.pdf;  DOJ  Declination
            plc Enters Civil Settlement of Alleged Violations of the AECA   Letter, Nortek Inc. (June 3, 2016), available at https://www.
            and ITAR and Agrees to Civil Penalty of $79 Million (May 17,   justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/865406/download; Nortek
            2011),  available  at  https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/  Inc., SEC Non-Prosecution Agreement (June 7, 2016), available
            ps/2011/05/163530.htm.                              at  https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2016/2016-109-npa-
                                                                nortek.pdf.
            294    26  U.S.C.  §  162(c)(1);  see also, e.g.,  Criminal
            Superseding  Information,  United States v.  Julia  Vivi  Wang,   307   DOJ  Declination  Letters,  available at  https://www.
            No.  16-cr-495  (S.D.N.Y.  Apr.  4,  2018),  ECF.  No.  55,  available   justice.gov/criminal-fraud/corporate-enforcement-policy/
            at https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/1061041/  declinations.
            download;  Criminal  Information,  United States v.  Roberto

                                                                                                                     117
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130