Page 187 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 187

from the mistakes we made in the past? Will the pandemic open
                the door to a better future? Will we get our global house in order?

                Simply put, will we put into motion the Great Reset? Resetting is
                an ambitious task, perhaps too ambitious, but we have no choice
                but to try our utmost to achieve it. It’s about making the world less
                divisive,  less  polluting,  less  destructive,  more  inclusive,  more

                equitable and fairer than we left it in the pre-pandemic era. Doing
                nothing,  or  too  little,  is  to  sleepwalk  towards  ever-more  social
                inequality,  economic  imbalances,  injustice  and  environmental
                degradation.  Failing  to  act  would  equate  to  letting  our  world

                become meaner, more divided, more dangerous, more selfish and
                simply  unbearable  for  large  segments  of  the  globe’s  population.
                To do nothing is not a viable option.


                     That said, the Great Reset is far from a done deal. Some may
                resist the necessity to engage in it, fearful of the magnitude of the

                task and hopeful that the sense of urgency will subside and the
                situation will soon get back to “normal”. The argument for passivity
                goes like this: we have been through similar shocks – pandemics,

                harsh recessions, geopolitical divides and social tensions – before
                and  we  will  get  through  them  again.  As  always,  societies  will
                rebuild, and so will our economies. Life goes on! The rationale for
                not resetting is also predicated on the conviction that the state of
                the world is not that bad and that we just need to fix a few things

                around the edges to make it better. It is true that the state of the
                world today is on average considerably better than in the past. We
                must  acknowledge  that,  as  human  beings,  we  never  had  it  so

                good.  Almost  all  the  key  indicators  that  measure  our  collective
                welfare  (like  the  number  of  people  living  in  poverty  or  dying  in
                conflicts, the GDP per capita, life expectancy or literacy rates, and
                even  the  number  of  deaths  caused  by  pandemics)  have  been
                continuously improving over pas centuries, impressively so in the

                last few decades. But they have been improving “on average” – a
                statistical  reality  that  is  meaningless  for  those  who  feel  (and  so
                often are) excluded. Therefore, the conviction that today’s world is

                better  than  it  has  ever  been,  while  correct,  cannot  serve  as  an
                excuse for taking comfort in the status quo and failing to fix the
                many ills that continue to afflict it.






                                                          186
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192