Page 190 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 190

divided, nationalistic and prone to conflicts than it is today. Many
                of the trends reviewed in the macro section suggest that, moving

                into the future, our world will be less open and less cooperative
                than before the pandemic. But an alternative scenario is possible,
                one  in  which  collective  action  within  communities  and  greater
                collaboration between nations enable a more rapid and peaceful

                exit  from  the  corona  crisis.  As  economies  restart,  there  is  an
                opportunity  to  embed  greater  societal  equality  and  sustainability
                into  the  recovery,  accelerating  rather  than  delaying  progress
                towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and unleashing

                a new  era  of prosperity.       [167]   What  could  make  this  possible  and
                raise the probability odds in favour of such an outcome?


                     Seeing the failures and fault lines in the cruel light of day cast
                by  the  corona  crisis  may  compel  us  to  act  faster  by  replacing

                failed ideas, institutions, processes and rules with new ones better
                suited  to  current  and  future  needs.  This  is  the  essence  of  the
                Great  Reset.  Could  the  globally  shared  experience  of  the
                pandemic  help  alleviate  some  of  the  problems  we  faced  as  the

                crisis started? Can a better society emerge from the lockdowns?
                Amartya Sen, laureate of the Nobel Prize in Economics, thinks so,
                believing that: “The need to act together can certainly generate an
                appreciation of the constructive role of public action,”               [168]  citing as

                proof  some  examples  like  World  War  II  having  made  people
                realize  the  importance  of  international  cooperation,  and
                convincing  countries  like  the  UK  of  the  benefit  of  better-shared
                food  and  healthcare  (and  the  eventual  creation  of  the  welfare

                state).  Jared  Diamond,  the  author  of  Upheaval:  How  Nations
                Cope with Crisis and Change, is of a similar opinion, hoping that
                the  corona  crisis  will  compel  us  to  address  four  existential  risks
                that we collectively face: 1) nuclear threats; 2) climate change; 3)

                the unsustainable use of essential resources like forests, seafood,
                topsoil and fresh water; and 4) the consequences of the enormous
                differences  in  standards  of  living  between  the  world’s  peoples:

                “Strange  as  it  may  seem,  the  successful  resolution  of  the
                pandemic crisis may motivate us to deal with those bigger issues
                that we have until now balked at confronting. If the pandemic does
                at last prepare us to deal with those existential threats, there may






                                                          189
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195