Page 97 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 97

An  underlying  reason  for  the  “no  winner”  argument  is  an
                intriguing  idea  put  forward  by  several  academics,  most  notably

                Niall  Ferguson.  Essentially,  it  says  that  the  corona  crisis  has
                exposed  the  failure  of  superpowers  like  the  US  and  China  by
                highlighting the success of small states. In the words of Ferguson:
                “The real lesson here is not that the U.S. is finished and China is

                going  to  be  the  dominant  power  of  the  21st  century.  I  think  the
                reality is that all the superpowers – the United States, the People's
                Republic of China and the European Union – have been exposed

                as highly dysfunctional.”        [100]  Being big, as the proponents of this
                idea  argue,  entails  diseconomies  of  scale:  countries  or  empires
                have grown so large as to reach a threshold beyond which they
                cannot  effectively  govern  themselves.  This  in  turn  is  the  reason
                why  small  economies  like  Singapore,  Iceland,  South  Korea  and

                Israel  seem  to  have  done  better  than  the  US  in  containing  the
                pandemic and dealing with it.


                     Predicting is a guessing game for fools. The simple truth is that
                nobody  can  tell  with  any  degree  of  reasonable  confidence  or

                certainty how the rivalry between the US and China will evolve –
                apart  from  saying  that  it  will  inevitably  grow.  The  pandemic  has
                exacerbated  the  rivalry  that  opposes  the  incumbent  and  the
                emerging power. The US has stumbled in the pandemic crisis and

                its  influence  has  waned.  Meanwhile,  China  may  be  trying  to
                benefit  from  the  crisis  by  expanding  its  reach  abroad.  We  know
                very  little  about  what  the  future  holds  in  terms  of  strategic
                competition between China and the US. It will oscillate between

                two  extremes:  a  contained  and  manageable  deterioration
                tempered  by  business  interests  at  one  end  of  the  spectrum,  to
                permanent and all-out hostility at the other.


                     1.4.4. Fragile and failing states



                     The  boundaries  between  state  fragility,  a  failing  state  and  a
                failed one are fluid and tenuous. In today’s complex and adaptive
                world, the principle of non-linearity means that suddenly a fragile
                state can turn into a failed state and that, conversely, a failed state

                can  see  its  situation  improve  with  equal  celerity  thanks  to  the
                intermediation of international organizations or even an infusion of




                                                           96
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102