Page 96 - COVID-19: The Great Reset
P. 96

fundamentally,  proponents  of  US  “irreducibility”  will  argue  with
                Ruchir  Sharma  that:  “US  economic  supremacy  has  repeatedly

                proved  declinists  wrong”.        [98]   They  will  also  agree  with  Winston
                Churchill, who once observed that the US has an innate capability
                to learn from its mistakes when he remarked that the US always
                did the right thing when all the alternatives have been exhausted.


                     Leaving  aside  the  highly  charged  political  argument

                (democracy versus autocracy), those who believe that the US will
                remain  a  “winner”  for  many  more  years  also  stress  that  China
                faces its own headwinds on its path to global superpower status.

                Those  most  frequently  mentioned  are  the  following:  1)  it  suffers
                from a demographic disadvantage, with a fast-ageing population
                and a working-age population that peaked in 2015; 2) its influence
                in Asia is constrained by existing territorial disputes with Brunei,

                India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Viet Nam;
                and 3) it is highly energy-dependent.


                     No winner


                     What do those who claim that “the pandemic bodes ill for both
                American and Chinese power – and for the global order” think?                        [99]

                They argue that, like almost all other countries around the world,
                both  China  and  the  US  are  certain  to  suffer  massive  economic
                damage  that  will  limit  their  capacity  to  extend  their  reach  and
                influence. China, whose trade sector represents more than a third

                of  total  GDP,  will  find  it  difficult  to  launch  a  sustained  economic
                recovery  when  its  large  trading  partners  (like  the  US)  are
                drastically  retrenching.  As  for  the  US,  its  over-indebtedness  will
                sooner  or  later  constrain  post-recovery  spending,  with  the  ever-

                present risk that the current economic crisis metastasizes into a
                systemic financial crisis.


                     Referring in the case of both countries to the economic hit and
                domestic  political  difficulties,  the  doubters  assert  that  both

                countries  are  likely  to  emerge  from  this  crisis  significantly
                diminished.  “Neither  a  new  Pax  Sinica  nor  a  renewed  Pax
                Americana  will  rise  from  the  ruins.  Rather,  both  powers  will  be
                weakened, at home and abroad”.





                                                           95
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101