Page 30 - December 2018 | Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal
P. 30

3   See  ORPC 1.2(d)(1).  For  domestic “Know Your  Client”
              The Nebraska opinion does not address   holding an asset for others, there should be   guidelines, see  https://www.americanbar.org/content/
        eTHICS PerSPeCTIve
            some of the practical issues embedded in   a written agreement signed by the payor,   dam/aba/publishing/criminal_justice_section_newslet-
                                                                                 ter/crimjust_taskforce_gtfgoodpracticesguidance.au-
            its  advice  immediately  to  convert  digital   the  payee,  and the lawyer. specifying the   thcheckdam.pdf. For an international perspective, see
            currency, including selecting the payment   terms  under  which  the asset is  received   https://www.actec.org/resources/fatf-and-the-lawyers-
                                                                                 role/.
            processor and identifying who bears any   and should be released. In addition, it is   4   Payment of a lawyer’s fees by a non-client requires com-
            transaction fee that may be associated   advisable to address bears the risk of loss   pliance with ORPC 1.8(f ).
            with  the  required  conversion.  A  lawyer   or changes in value.   5   Internal Revenue Service Notice 2014-21 (March 25,
            who intends to accept a digital currency                             2014). https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-14-21.pdf
            should address these specifics, as well as   Every Practitioner Needs to Know   6   R. Rotunda, “Bitcoin and the Legal Ethics of Lawyers,”
                                                                                 https://verdict.justia.com/2017/11/06/bitcoin-legal-eth-
            the lawyer’s intent immediately to convert   Something About Digital Currency  ics-lawyers.
            the  currency  to  U.S.  dollars,  in  her  fee   A competent lawyer needs baseline   7   See ORPC 1.5(a), (d)(3) and Comment [6A], 1.15(a) and
            agreement with the client.        knowledge about  digital currency  even   (c) and 1.16(e). Fees deemed “earned on receipt” are a
                                                                                 special case; per Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Op.
                                              if the lawyer or his firm has resolved not   2016-1, such fees should not be deposited into a trust ac-
            Holding Digital Currency for Others  to accept or hold digital currency for any   count, although subject to refund under ORPC 1.5(d)(3)
                                                                                 and 1.16(e).
            The Nebraska opinion finds that a lawyer   purpose. A practitioner that does any work   8  The Ohio Rule on point is ORPC 1.15.
            may hold bitcoins or other digital currency   that involves the inventory or transfer of
            in escrow or trust for a client or third party   assets must consider the possibility that
            pursuant to the ethics rules governing   a  party’s  assets  include  digital  currency.   Deborah Coleman of Coleman Law LLC
            holding property for others. The rule   Thus both civil and criminal lawyers, and   helps parties in conflict resolve complex
            requirements include holding the property   those who handle litigation, transactions,   business disputes through mediation or
            separate from the lawyer’s property,   estate  planning and probate,  insolvency,   arbitration. She also provides profes-
            safeguarding it and satisfying recordkeeping   and domestic relations  should  educate   sional ethics counsel and represents
                      8
            requirements.  The opinion suggests several   themselves about this form of asset.  respondents in grievances. She chaired
            possible security precautions, including                             the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics
            encryption of the private key required   1   See,  e.g.,  John  Stark  Reed,  “Why  Lawyers  Should  Nev-  and Professional Responsibility, and the
            to send the bitcoins, requiring multiple   er  Accept  Their Fees  in  Crypto-Currency”,  https://  CMBA’s Ethics Committee. She has been
                                               www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-law-firms-should-
            private keys to access them, or maintaining   never-accept-fees-cryptocurrency-john-reed-stark/   a CMBA member since 1977. She can be
            the wallet in a storage device that is not   (June 5, 2018). Reed is a former Chief, SEC Office of In-  reached at dac@dacolemanlaw.com or
                                               ternet Enforcement.
            continuously connected to the Internet.   2   https://www.bna.com/law-firms-accepting-n73014464226/   (216) 991-4510. For more information,
            As in any situation in which a lawyer is   “More Law Firms Are Accepting Bitcoin Payment”,   go to www.dacolemanlaw.com.
                                               Corporate on Bloomberg Law 9/6/17.



                                         PROVIDING PRACTICAL



                                         & EFFICIENT SOLUTIONS


                                         to achieve your family and business objectives










                 ESTATE PLANNING  |  TRUST & PROBATE ADMINISTRATION
                 BUSINESS SUCCESSION PLANNING  |   ASSET PROTECTION PLANNING

                 CHARITABLE GIVING  |   PROBATE LITIGATION


                 • Susan Racey   • Erica McGregor   • Pete Igel   • Bill Stavole
                 • Joe Ferraro    • Tom Peppard   • Matt Stanley   • Justin Eddy


                 950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100  |  Cleveland, Ohio 44113  |  216.592.5000    tuckerellis.com



      30 |  Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal                                                    clemetrobar.org
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35