Page 33 - December 2019 Bar Journal
P. 33

EXTRA        FEATURE




            THE SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION


            DON’T  OVERLOOK THIS  ALTERNATIVE  TO

            PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS




                                                                                   BY MATTHEW A. KALIFF




               ndividuals who want to establish a personal or   Code Section 4946; i.e., substantial contributors   all aspects of a supporting organization’s operation
               family charitable enterprise often think first   and related persons) other than persons who   and governance is essential to maintaining public
               of setting up a private foundation. A distinct   are solely foundation managers.   charity status and avoiding potential penalties.
               identity, close family control, and name   Section 509(a)(3) classifies a supporting   A  supporting  organization  may have  broad
            I recognition make private foundations very   organization as Type I, Type II or Type III based   latitude in charitable grantmaking. Because a
            appealing and the right solution for some donors.   on the extent of control of the supported public   supporting organization must “operate for the
            However, being your own philanthropist comes   charity. Type I supporting organizations are   benefit of, perform the functions of, or carry out
            with at a price: administration, tax consequences,   analogous to a parent-subsidiary relationship as the   the purposes of” its supported public charity,
            minimum distribution requirements and reporting   supporting organization is “operated, supervised   the extent of the charity’s purposes marks the
            obligations, to name a few. For their clients whose   or controlled” by the public charity. Public   outer limit of the supporting organization’s
            goals include a philanthropic presence, legacy   charities such as community foundations will   grant purposes. However, grants are subject
            and family engagement, practitioners should   typically use the Type I model for their supporting   to the general tax law limitations applicable to
            remember to consider the supporting organization   organization programs. Type II and Type III have   charitable grantmaking entities. Grants must
            option. It has the features of a separate charitable   lesser degrees of control and supervision from
            grantmaking entity with the tax and administrative   the supported public charity. They are subject to
            efficiencies of a public charity.  greater scrutiny and are generally not relevant
                                               options for individual donors.
            Supporting Organizations Generally   A supporting organization may be established   Want to
            A supporting organization is a separately   as either a nonprofit corporation or as a trust
            incorporated entity that is defined in Internal   under state law.  The governing documents will
            Revenue Code Section 509(a)(3) as a Section   provide that the supported public charity elects   take center
            501(c)(3) organization that qualifies as a public   a majority of the supporting organization’s board
            charity through its close connection to one or   of directors or trustees. The donor or his or her
            more 501(c)(3) public charities. The supporting   representatives (usually family members) elects   stage at
            organization’s “public charity” status results   the balance of the board. The minority status of the
            from the close relationship to the supported   donor trustees is necessary because the supporting
            charity. Some public charities refer to their   organization’s classification as a “public charity”   the CMBA?
            affiliated supporting organizations as “supporting   rather than a “private foundation” is based upon
            foundations.” As discussed below, it is this   the fact that substantial contributors and persons
            public charity status that can leverage significant   related to them do not “control” the supporting
            efficiencies over private foundations.   organization.
              A supporting organization must meet the   Despite their minority status, the donor-elected
            following three elements:          trustees have their place at the table and may
            1. It must be organized and at all times operated   actively participate in the affairs of the supporting
              exclusively for the “benefit of, to perform the   organization. They may be elected as officers.
              functions of, or to carry out the purposes of”   They may recommend and vote on charitable   Chairing a program or
              one or more other specified public charities   grants. They may participate in crafting mission
              described in IRC Section 509(a)(1) or (2)   statements and setting investment and spending   speaking at CMBA CLE is
              (qualified public charities);    policies. Like a private foundation, the supporting   a great way to build your
            2. It must be operated, supervised, or controlled   organization provides a platform for multiple   exposure!  Email your
              by or in connection with one or more qualified   generations of the donor’s family to engage in the   name and CLE idea to
              public charities; and            family’s charitable mission and long-term legacy   CLE@CleMetroBar.org.
            3. It must not be controlled, directly or indirectly,   plan. However, demonstrated adherence to the
              by one or more “disqualified persons” (see IR   formalities of control by the supported charity in

            DECEMBER 2019                                                              CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR JOURNAL | 33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38