Page 211 - Ming_China_Courts_and_Contacts_1400_1450 Craig lunas
P. 211

contains some information, but not about the size of the   As noted above, scholars have made various calculations
            ships. It gives details about the numbers of ships that were   in attempts to figure out the size of the ships from the scanty
            built, and where and when they were constructed, repaired   and scattered information that is available. Professor Xin
                      19
            or modified.  It also mentions that some ships were built   Yuan’ou, a shipbuilding engineer at Shanghai Jiaotong
            from scratch, while others were converted (gaizao 改造) from   University, whose paper ‘A Technical Analysis of the Size of
            grain transport ships. Under Yongle’s reign the overseas   Zheng He’s Ships’ (Guanyu Zheng He baochuan chidu de jishu
            grain transport ships that the preceding Yuan dynasty had   fenxi 關於鄭和寶船尺度的技術分析) first excited my interest
            relied upon for south-to-north grain transport were largely   in this topic, was the one who estimated that each of the
            phased out; the construction of the new capital in Beijing   20,000 ton ships (his estimate for the 450ft size) would have
            had necessitated refurbishment of the canal system to allow   required 8,000 men to man it. If the figure of 27,000 people
            grain to be transported on inland waterways instead of by   in each fleet is correct, and if 8,000 men were required for
            sea. Interestingly this meant that some of the existing grain   each ship, there would have been fewer than four ships in
            transport ships no longer used for that purpose were   the entire fleet, not the 62, 100 or 250 that have been
            converted into treasure ships for Zheng He’s voyages.   mentioned in the sources. For this reason, the figure of
            Instances of these conversions are recorded in the Shilu.  8,000 men as a complement must be incorrect. This is one
               The three first-hand travel accounts, those of Ma Huan   argument for saying that the ships cannot have been the
            馬歡, Fei Xin 費信 and Gong Zhen, unfortunately say very   20,000 ton size.
            little about the ships.  They comment that the vessels were   Starting out from the smallest possible complement, the
                             20
            enormous, but do not specify the size. There are hints about   estimate by Gong Zhen of 200–300 people per ship would
            the size, however, such as when it is mentioned that in some   work out to 112 ships (27,000 people divided by 250, the
            ports the large ships of the fleet had to moor offshore while   average of his 200–300 figure). This figure for the number of
            people and goods were transported into port on smaller   ships is at least within the range mentioned in the sources.
            ships. Again, all we can tell from these accounts is that the   The number of vessels given in two almost identical
            ships were very large.                             inscriptions contemporary with the voyages is 100 – these
               One piece of rather more meaty information is provided   are the Liujiagang and Changle inscriptions, both dated
            by Gong Zhen, who says that 200–300 men were required to   1431, discovered in Taicang (near present-day Shanghai) and
                                                    21
            operate the sails, anchors and rudders of the ships.  From   Fujian (near Fuzhou), respectively. This number sounds
            these figures we can perhaps obtain a rough idea of their size.   suspiciously like an estimate that has been rounded off. It
            With such a small complement, however, these would not be   works out to 270 men per ship, which falls within the range
            44-zhang ships. According to one expert, a 44-zhang ship   estimated by Gong Zhen. Professor Xin also tries dividing
                                            22
            would have needed 8,000 men to man it.  The USS Minnesota   27,000 by 62 to determine the average number of men per
            was manned by 838 men and 42 officers, but as a steel ship it   ship on the first voyage, obtaining 436 men per ship.
            would have needed far fewer men than a wooden ship. In an   However, this calculation does not take into account the
            anonymous itinerary for the seventh expedition, found in   existence of smaller ships as well. A similar operation
            Zhu Yunming’s 祝允明 (1461–1527) miscellany Qianwen ji    carried out for the 48 ships mentioned by Fei Xin for the
            前聞記 (Record of Things Heard) (c. 1500), the number of people   third voyage yields 563 men per ship. From these efforts, Xin
            sailing on the voyage is given as 27,550, broken down into the   concludes that Lo Jung-pang was correct and the ships were
            following categories of passengers and crew on board:   probably about 500 tons in capacity and 800 tons in
               Officers; troops serving under the banners; group-leaders   displacement. He estimates that they were about 250ft in
               (huozhang, literally ‘fire-leaders’); helmsmen; anchormen;   length, and this is the size I have settled on as most likely to
               interpreters; business-factors; accountants; doctors; iron-  be correct.
               anchor mechanics; caulkers; scaffold-builders; other craftsmen;   In China today there is sometimes fierce disagreement
               sailors; and boatmen. 23                        among scholars on this subject. Those who argue that the
               Another source of information about the size occurs on one   Ming history must be right and believe that Zheng He’s ships
            of the stone stelae that were set up in China and in other   were 44 zhang long form one camp, and those who say they
            places that Zheng He visited. Words inscribed on stone are   were 2,000 liao in size form another. These two groups take
            often thought to be more trustworthy than written records.   their positions very seriously and have sometimes almost
            One of them was at the Jinghaisi 靜海寺 (Calm Sea     come to blows. I witnessed a heated debate at the 600th
            Monastery)in Nanjing, where Zheng He went to pray for   anniversary conference in July 2005, in which an elderly
            smooth sailing before he set out on his voyages (Pl. 22.4). It   scholar with strong views nearly fainted. Since then, Chinese
            mentions the size of the ships (Pl. 22.5). The inscription says:   maritime historians have become less strident on the matter
            ‘in the third year of Yongle (1405), the ships were 2,000 liao 料   and have agreed to disagree, but there are still strong
             . . . and in the seventh year (1409) they were 1,500 liao’. The   feelings on the issue.
            appearance of yet another unit for the size of the ships, the liao,   In recent years, some members of the small ship camp
            creates new problems. It seems to have been a unit of capacity,   have formed a group called the Beijing Association for the
            used for calculating the amount of grain and other goods to be   Study of Zheng He and Maritime Culture (Beijing Zheng He
            transported. The scholar Lo Jung-pang reckons that it was   yu Haiyang wenhua yanjiu hui 北京鄭和與海洋文化研究會),
            500 pounds, in which case the 2,000-liao ships would have   which is currently building a replica of a 2000-liao treasure
                                                24
            been 500 tons and the 1500-liao ships 375 tons.  However, this   ship at the Treasure Shipyard in Nanjing. The overall
            is just an estimate and should not be taken as the final word.  specifications of this ship are as follows:


                                                                 Investigating Zheng He’s Ships: What is Known and Knowable? | 201
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216