Page 45 - Tibetan Thangka Painting Methodsand Mat, Jackson
P. 45

pa scholar criticize the composition of a recent painting
             where the artist had wrongly placed the yi-dam Hevajra
             above some of the gurus of the Sa-skya-pa lineage. As he
             reminded us, the preeminence of the guru over the yi-
             dam is an important point that one also finds in
             biographical literature, for example in the life of Marpa
             the Translator (1012-1099) when the great Indian siddha
             Naropa projected the form of the yi-dam and asked
             Marpa to whom he would bow, to the yi-dam or to the
             guru himself. A similar episode also occurred in a dream
             that Rje-btsun Grags-pa-rgyal-mtshan (1147-1216) had
             of his father Sa-chen Kun-dga'-snying-po (1092-1158).6
                 It bears repeating that the principle of hierarchy
             did not govern all compositions. In thangkas depicting
             teachers or great yogic adepts (mahasiddhas), yi-dams
             were sometimes placed above and before them in the
             sky, as if appearing there in a vision. (But here the yi-
             dam was usually painted on a smaller scale.) Also, for
             aesthetic reasons such as balance and equal distribution
             some artists placed members of different classes on the
             same level of the painting (although the relative status of
             the deities could still be shown by putting one deity
             outside and a little below the other). Furthermore, a few
             painters were ignorant of these precise hierarchical
             conventions. Nevertheless most knew in general that
             they should put such figures as Buddhas and teachers
             above, and wrathful figures below.


             Didactic Paintings                             Emblem of Manjusrl.  drawing by Legdrup Gyatsho.

             Didactic pamtmgs express through a pictorial medium
             some aspects of Buddhist doctrine. In a sense even a
             didactic painting was a rten, being a receptacle or
             embodiment of religious truth. Typical examples include
             those that illustrate the arrangement of the physical
             universe as taught in the Abhidharma, the layout of the
             animate universe in the form of the Wheel of Existence
             (srid pa'i 'khor lo), illustrations of monastic garb,
             implements and practices as taught in the Vinaya, and
             illustrations of meditative postures and states. We could
             even include some medical and astrological paintings
             within this class of religious art because they too often
             grew out of scriptures held by tradition to be the word
             of the Buddha.
                 Another related group of paintings represented
             Buddhist teachings or themes through the more indirect
             means of symbols. The eight-spoked wheel of Dharma
             and other such symbols were the earliest manifestations
             of Buddhist art in India. When Buddhism spread to Tibet
             many centuries later, such symbolical representations
             were  also. introduced.  The  depictions of certain
             auspicious symbols still common in Tibetan wall paint-
             ings are a continuation of this tradition.
                 A more complex symbolical composition is the
             "Mongol Leading the Tiger" (sog po stag 'khrid) which
             represented the three great Mahayana bodhisattvas
             Avalokitesvara, Manjusri and VajrapaI).i in the form of
             the Mongol, the tiger and the chain connecting them.
             Some versions symbolize the suppression of the four  'Mongol leading the Tiger', drawing by Wangdrak.



                                                                              DIDACTIC PAINTINGS      41
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50