Page 47 - Tibetan Thangka Painting Methodsand Mat, Jackson
P. 47

Notes

               1.  One authority who classified temples as sku rten
                  was Bo-dong Pal).-chen. See -his Rten gsum bzhengs
                  tshul bstan bcos lugs bshad pa, Collected Works,
                  vo1.2, p.332.5.
               2.  See also Gerasimova, "Compositional Structure",
                  pA8.

               3.  The classifications "refuge tree" and "assembly
                  field" are not mutually exclusive. Here they have
                  been  distinguished  merely on formal grounds.
                  Refuge trees can function as assembly fields, and
                  vice versa. Refuge trees for instance are "assembly
                  fields to which one goes for refuge" (skyabs su 'gro
                  ba'i tshogs zhing).

              4.  We have seen a photograph of a rare Sa-skya-pa
                  tshogs zhing, painted by the father of Legdrup
                  Gyatsho at 'Phen-po Nalendra. The central figure
                  was Sa-skya  Pal).~ita.  Refuge-tree paintings were
                  also relatively uncommon among the Sa-skya-pa in
                  Tibet, although the visualization itself was standard.

              5.  The term 'dod lha ("desired deity" or "chosen
                  deity") for deities placed in a thangka according
                  to individual preference is also attested in Tibetan
                  literature. See for example Zhu-chen Tshul-khrims-
                  rin-chen, Chos smra ba'i bande tshul khrims rin
                  chen du bod pa'i skye ba phal pa 'i rkang 'thung dge
                  sdig 'dres ma'i las kyi yal ga phan tshun du 'dzings
                  par bde sdug gi 10 'dab dus kyi rgyal mos res mos su
                  bsgyur ba.  The Autobiography of Tshul-khrims-
                  r.in-chen of Sde-dge and Other of His Selected
                  Writings (New Delhi,  1971), pp.331.4.; 546.2.

              6.  An early thangka that was not in exact agreement
                  with the hierarchical ordering outlined above is
                  described in a biographical sketch of Nag-tsho
                  10-tsa-ba Tshul-khrims-rgyal-ba (fl. lIth century).
                  See Khetsun Sangpo, Biographical Dictionary of
                  Tibet (Dharamsa1a, 1973-), vo1.5, p.9. The story
                  is related of how Nag-tsho lo-tsa-ba commissioned
                  an Indian master painter named Kr~l).a  to paint a
                  large thangka with Jo-bo-rje Atisa as its main figure.
                  According to this account, at the top of the thangka
                  the yi-dams of Atisa were portrayed, and beneath
                  them were painted Atisa's twelve main gurus. The
                  image of Atisa himself was in the center, with an
                  attendant depicted both to his right and to his left.
                  On the outer right and left edges the painter por-
                  trayed the main events in Atisa's life. Beneath the
                  great  master  were  painted  the major Tibetan
                  disciples of Atisa, including Khu, 'Brom and Rngog,
                  all shown as if studying in a religious school.
                  Finally, beneath all of them, Nag-tsho 10-tsa-ba
                  himself was pictured in a pose of reverent, suppli-
                  cation.
              7.  The description of this design given in our English
                  caption  in  Chogay  Trichen,  Thubten Legshay
                  Gyatsho, Gateway to the Temple (Kathmandu,
                  1979)  p.53,  contained  some  mistakes,  here
                  corrected.


                                                                                   NOTES CHAPTER 3     43
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52