Page 171 - A Re-examination of Late Qing Dynasty Porcelain, 1850-1920 THESIS
P. 171

(superintendent of the imperial kilns at Jingdezhen, 1682–1756) in 1735, who wrote that

                   nearly 3,000 pieces of ceramic of lesser quality were shipped to Beijing for the emperor


                   to give as gifts. 216   This evidence establishes that while the ceramics used as gifts were

                   considered to be of lesser quality, they were still produced using the same imperial-grade


                   materials, craftsmen, and kiln workshops.  Although the final outcome resulted in a

                   distinction of “lesser” quality, it appears that these wares were produced in a similar


                   fashion and resulted in ceramics that mirrored what would have been used in the imperial

                   household.  Regardless of the ware’s quality, a ceramic commissioned by the emperor


                   was still seen as a possession of the emperor, meaning that ceramics produced as a result

                   of imperial order can be viewed as imperial objects regardless of modern scholars’


                   opinions regarding the quality.  Additionally, the gift-giving standard Qianlong set

                   continued into the late Qing and became a method of porcelain distribution that can be

                   traced directly to Western collections.


                          As both a collector and an art patron, Qianlong set the tone within Eastern and

                   Western understandings of Chinese art collecting.  It is primarily his collection that is


                   showcased in museum collections worldwide, which is a fact that is analyzed in a later

                   section.  Rulers of the late Qing followed Qianlong’s collecting standards.  Qianlong


                   served as an example of not only a fine collector but also a highly capable ruler.  As a

                   result, individuals like the Empress Dowager Cixi cultivated a direct connection to


                   Qianlong by emulating his porcelain patronage.  Not only did this actively create a bond

                   between the empress dowager and the successful emperor, but it also connected her to


                   Qianlong’s large imperial collection, which actively represented the power he held over


                   216  Wang Guangyao, Zhongguo Gudai Guanyao Zhidu (China’s Ancient System of Official Kilns)
                   (Beijing: Zijincheng Chubanshe, 2004), 198.
                                                            132
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176