Page 41 - China, 5000 years : innovation and transformation in the arts
P. 41

—

upright, all will go well even though he does not         Confucius and his followers elevated the ruler by
issue orders. But if he himself is not upright, even      placing him firmly at the top of a moral hierarchy
though he gives orders, they will not be obeyed"
(Analects, 13.6). "Were a true king to appear, within     —in which all rulers and subjects, nobles and
a generation goodness would prevail" (Analects,           —commoners, parents and children wholeheartedly

13.12).                                                   devote themselves to fulfilling the parts assigned to
                                                          them; in this ideal world superiors and inferiors
The true king would rule through ritual, but              look after each other and everything gets done
Confucius did not conceive of him as a priest-king.       without conflict or the use of force. This view of
Nor did Confucius ever imply that the gods or
ancestors would cause harm to those who failed to         the ruler exalts him but also burdens him, for when
perform the sacrifices to them properly; he himself       the world is not in perfect harmony the fault is

is said to have performed sacrifices "as though" the      mostly his. Mencius (ca. 370—ca. 300 bce) once told
spirits were present. Later followers like Xunzi
(ca. 310-ca. 220 bce) explicitly denied any link          a king that if a ruler were to appear who was not
between the performance of rites and the action of
spirits or gods. Xunzi argued that Heaven is              inclined toward killing people, "The people would

impartial and human affairs result from human             flow toward him the way water flows down. No
efforts. Praying to Heaven or to gods does not get        one would be able to stop them" (1A.6). On
them to intervene.
                                                          another occasion he told a king that if he treated
Both Confucius' and Xunzi's love of ritual was            his people well by reducing taxes and lightening
based at least in part on aesthetic attraction: they      punishments, they would be so eager to fight for
responded to the beauty of well-choreographed             him that even if armed only with sharpened sticks
ceremonies combining instrumental music, song,            they could defeat the well-equipped soldiers of the
and dance. But their intellectual argument,
addressed to rulers, concerned the nearly magical         powerful states of Qin and Chu, which had been
way in which ritual can create social and political       encroaching on the king's territory.
harmony. Confucius told his disciple Yan Hui that
"the whole world would respond to the true                As texts recording the teachings of Confucius and
                                                          his followers began to circulate in the late Zhou,
goodness of one who could for one day restrain            they helped freeze the Confucian position and also

himself and return to ritual" (Analects, 12. 1). Ritual,  Ainvited counter-arguments. few thinkers
to Confucius, was not restricted to dealings with
ancestors or deities: it was also an aspect of the way    —generally ones labeled Daoist went further than
the ruler dealt with his subjects. "Lead the people
by means of government policies and regulate them         the Confucians in urging rulers to do less. The
through punishments, and they will be evasive and         Laozi said, "The sage manages affairs by doing
have no sense of shame. Lead them by means of
virtue and regulate them through rituals and they         nothing and spreads the teachings that are not put
will have a sense of shame and moreover have
                                                          in words." The more a ruler does, the worse the
standards" (Analects, 2.3).                               result: the more laws and regulations, the more
                                                          thieves and robbers. The sage ruler "ensures that the
Xunzi went much further than Confucius in                 people know nothing and desire nothing." 4

emphasizing the connection between ritual and             More common than calls for nonaction, however,
distinctions of rank. The funerals of rulers had to be
on a scale corresponding to their rank in every           were calls for action. Mozi (ca. 490-ca. 403 bce)

—detail the numbers of inner and outer coffins, the       proposed strengthening the ability of rulers to

quality and quantity of burial clothes and food           command obedience. He argued that unless one
offerings, the length of the interval between death       man was elevated above all others, there would be
and burial. In ancestral rites, the highest ruler,
presiding over the entire realm, had to offer             no final authority and everyone would have Ins
numerous types of food and wine to seven
generations of ancestors, but a ruler of a single state   own opinion, making any sort of cooperation or
should make fewer offerings to only five                  social organization impossible. The solution was for
generations, and so on. Rulers must perform these
rituals correctly, not because they need the aid or       —everyone to agree with those above including the
fear the wrath of the dead, but in order to
demonstrate their filial gratitude and respect for        ruler, who must conform to Heaven: "What the
tradition, and to show that they accept their place
                                                          superior thinks right, all shall think right."The text
in the political hierarchy.                               attributed to Guanzi (traditional dates 683-642 BCE)
                                                          agreed that the peace and stability of the state
                                                          depend on elevating the ruler. But Guanzi drew

                                                          attention to the need for coercion. What secured
                                                          the ruler's control was his power "to grant life, to

                                                          kill, to enrich, to impoverish, to ennoble, to debase"
                                                          Even if the ruler's personal conduct was not
                                                          superior, given these powers, all would accept his
                                                          leadership and "not dare to indulge 111 opinions
                                                          about the quality of his conduct."

                                                           Ihe leading Legalist thinkers would largely have
                                                          agreed with these sentiments. In the book ascribed

THE INTELLECTUAL AND RELIGIOUS CONTEXT OF CHINESE ART     39
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46