Page 51 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 51

34



                              Themes of national pride and a desire to preserve and study one’s own national

                       tradition in this period are not surprising given the prevalence of nation-centered reform


                       in twentieth-century China.   What is significant is how art leaders in China emphasized

                       the importance of the physical materiality of objects to the study of China’s art history.


                       A Chinese article introducing a seminal book on Chinese art published by the Burlington

                       Magazine of the Royal Arts Academy in 1935 declared it enlightening for those wanting


                       to understand Chinese art history because “Westerners base their academic research on

                                                                         65
                       physical contact with the “real things” (shiwuྼي).   Comments by Palace Museum

                       organizers and the Organizing Committee about the process of lending art works also


                       revealed a similar logic hinged upon the centrality of physical and material aspects of

                       objects.   An example of this is evident in the way in which members of the Chinese


                       organizing committee worked meticulously to implement measures that protected the

                       materiality of these objects.  For instance, in his report, Zhuang Shangyan went to great

                       lengths to explain the use of multiple layers of velvet bags, cotton cases, wooden crates


                       and finally steel cases to prevent any material damage from occurring during the acts of

                                                                   66
                       transporting, packing, displaying, and storing.   Even John C. Ferguson, an art collector,

                       dealer, Executive Yuan consultant, and a one-time advisor to the Qing court, observed

                                                                                               67
                       that “Unusual care was taken in their shipment so as to insure their safety.”     Realizing

                       that the object’s correct and proper transport could substantiate the responsibility of the

                       new Republican government over all things related to the “nation,” Chinese museum


                       scholars and researchers thus attached extreme importance to the objects’ fragility and

                       substantive condition.   In so doing, their concerns illuminated the Chinese organizers’


                       preoccupation with the materiality of the sent objects.
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56