Page 278 - Edo: Art in Japan, 1615–1868
P. 278

Edo artists began seriously to render the  effects  of weather  (Hiroshige, cats. 149,184), clouds (Hokusai,
                                       cat.  171), sky (Kôkan, cat. 186), time  of day (Hiroshige, cats.  179,181; Hokusai, cat. 176), the  play of light
                                       across form  (Naotake, cats. 187,188), and  even fleeting visual phenomena  like fireworks (Hiroshige,
                                       cat. 147). It was  as if they began seriously to use  their own eyes for the first time. Thus Naotake's Shino-
                                       bazu  Pond (cat. 188), with its bizarre oversized flowers modeled in light and  shade, becomes  less dis-
                                       turbing when  we realize that the  subject of the picture is not so much  Shinobazu Pond itself as  the
                                       superiority of the  gaze that takes in the  fall  of light and records it. Even traditional schema  such  as
                                       Watanabe Shikô's Flowers  and Trees  of the  Four  Seasons (cat. 162)  are  given new  immediacy as  a result of
                                       this emphasis on mimesis, based on seeing, understanding,  and transcribing  form. The real is even  put

                                       to the  service of the  visionary (the surreal), as in Nagasawa Rosetsu's Mount Fuji  and Cranes (cat. 158).           277
                                               Naotake's Shinobazu  Pond  may  not  resemble Taiga's Wondrous Scenery o/Mutsu  and  True View of
                                       Kojima Bay (cats. 164,166), but the  two artists, along with many others, share  the  endeavor to create
                                       the  effects  of light playing on form. Maruyama Ôshin and Maruyama Okyo (cats. 189,190) are engaged
                                       with resolving the  tension  between  the character of the  East Asian brush — an instrument  designed
                                       first and foremost to deliver line, which they augmented with the  use of a nontraditional flat brush
                                        (hake)  — and  the  modeling of form, which is undercut by outline. Here is the  classic case of Heinrich
                                       Wolfflin's  "linear" versus "painterly."
                                               It is no coincidence that  during the  Edo period numerous optical devices — telescopes, micro-
                                        scopes, zograscopes, peep shows, and  eyeglasses  — became the  rage. By the  late Edo period  western
                                                                      46
                                       photography  was known in Japan.  These instruments, too, fueled the  revolution, not only in  seeing,
                                       but in the  radical shift of episteme  to which it was linked. As one Edo-period thinker mused, "The
                                        microscope exceeds  even the Buddha's eyes." 47
                                               An immediate  legacy of these transformers of the  action of looking (and the  concomitant
                                        redefinition  of humanity's  place in the universe) is the new emphasis  on the panorama, the  endeavor
                                        to convey the  limitlessness  of physical space within  a finite picture space. Infinity is nowhere  so
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283