Page 68 - Made For Trade Chinese Export Paintings In Dutch Collections
P. 68

18-10-2016  15:52  Pagina 3
                               64 pag:Opmaak 1
           roos boek 065-128 d


                    From 1825 to 1830, the NTS, the national  later, in 1847, Muller discovered that Dutch
                    import and export company set up to expand  ships were importing more than 3¼ million
                    existing trade relations and open up new  guilders worth of merchandise into China and
                    channels, undertook five expeditions directly to  exporting about 1¾ million guilders worth of
                    Canton. 12  Although this initiative was  Chinese goods. 15  People mainly bought tea and
                    praiseworthy, their English and American rivals,  sent Dutch products (mostly tropical products
                    who had taken over the China trade and    from the Netherlands Indies) in return; however,
                    dominated this field in Europe, overshadowed  there was almost no opium, unlike the Scottish
                    the Dutch. From research conducted by Blussé,  Jardine Matheson & Co., or the American
                    Broeze et al. and Muller, we know that the  trading house Russell & Company. The NTS
                    Netherlands’ pole position in the global tea trade  documents only record one consignment of 55   67
                    was gone forever by the 1830s. 13  Exceptions to  cases of opium.
                    this decline were commercial enterprises based in  1856 is an important year in the history of
                    Leiden, where wools like laken and polemieten  Dutch relations with Canton. During an uprising
                    were produced, and in tropical products from  in Canton, the so-called Arrow War (1856-
                    Java, like edible bird’s nests, which funded their  1860), which resulted in the Qing government
                    Chinese wares. Indeed, trading activities between  opening up eight more treaty ports, all the
                    Holland and China only continued on a small  consular buildings went up in flames, including
                    scale. After a while, in the 1840s, the Dutch  the new Dutch commercial office, established in
                    regained some ground in the textile market.  Canton in 1844 (which was serving as a
                    And, due to the so-called Cultuurstelsel  consular building at this time). Consequently,
                    (Cultivation System) introduced on Java in  Canton ceased to be home to the Dutch
                    1830, there was extensive trade with the  consulate after more than a century of trading
                    Netherlands East Indies in various colonial  there. From that moment, Dutch nineteenth-
                    products, including raw materials, dyes, spices,  century trading activities on the South Chinese
                    coffee, sugar and indigo. Consequently, the total  coast were undertaken either from the
                    picture of Dutch trade with China was not as  “significant Dutch house on the Praya Grande”,
                    desolate as some Dutch colonial officials  which served as the Dutch consulate in Macao
                    depicted at that time. In 1843, Dutch colonial  or, later, from the Dutch posts in Hong Kong
                    officers like Modderman, Hueser and Freyss  and Amoy (Xiamen). 16  The last Dutch
                    were ordered by the NTS to investigate what the  professional consul, Piet Hamel (1845-1900),
                    prospects were for the growth of trade between  was stationed in Amoy in China. He left the
                    Holland and China in the years to come. Their  country in 1892.
                    reports concluded that the prospects looked  In retrospect, as Ferry de Goey concludes in
                    rather dim. 14  Nevertheless, only a few years  his paper ‘The business of consuls; consuls and



                    ---
                    12 Broeze 1978, 40-65. First expedition: 1825-1826, supercarga M. v.d. Abeele, tea taster W. Loots, ships: Jorina
                    (Varkevisser, Dorrepaal & Co., Rotterdam), captain F. Rietmeyer; Vijf Gezusters (Van Hoboken, Rotterdam), captain
                    M.A. Jacometti; Schoon Verbond (Voûte & Co., Amsterdam), captain D. Kraijer; Rotterdam (H.J. Coster & Co,
                    Amsterdam) captain T.S. Waters. Second expedition: 1826-1827, supercarga G.N. Stulen, tea taster P.E. Thueré, ships:
                    De Zeeuw (Van de Broecke, Luteyn & Schouten, Middelburg), captain C. Riekels; Ida Aleyda (J.H. Bagman & Zoon,
                    Amsterdam), captain C. Swaan; Neerlands Koning (Van Hoboken, Rotterdam), captain K. Schinkel; Cornelis
                    Houtman (Gebr. Hartsen, Amsterdam), captain J. Duijff. Third expedition: 1827-1828, supercarga A. Meijer, tea taster
                    J.I.L. Jacobson, ships: Neerlands Koningin (Varkevisser, Dorrepaal & Co., Rotterdam), captain W. Verloop; Prins van
                    Oranje (Societeit van Nederlandsche Scheepsbouw en Scheepvaart), captain W. Blom; Helena (Nederlandsche
                    Scheepsreederij, Amsterdam), captain D. Grim; Stad Rotterdam (Reederij van Vier Scheepen, Rotterdam), captain C.
                    Poort. Fourth expedition: 1828-1829, supercarga A.H. Büchler, tea taster P.E. Thueré, ships: Neerlands Koning (Van
                    Hoboken, Rotterdam), captain K. Schinkel; Henrietta Klasina (Nederlandsche Scheepsreederij, Amsterdam), captain
                    L.T. Heijde; Susanna (Nederlandse Scheepsreederij, Amsterdam), captain P.C. de Roth; Raymond (J. Roelandts & Co.,
                    Antwerpen) captain G. van den Broecke. Fifth expedition: 1829-1830, supercarga J. Valcke de Knuyt, tea taster J.I.L.
                    Jacobson, ships: Johanna Cornelia (C. & A. Vlierboom, Rotterdam), captain P.S. Schuil; Olivier van Noort (Gebr.
                    Hartsen, Amsterdam) captain J. Duijff.
                    13 Blussé 2004, 63-67. Broeze, Bruijn and Gaastra 1977, 294-297. Muller 1917, 327-350.
                    14 Blussé 2004, 65.
                    15 Muller 1917, 346.
                    16 Ibid., 358.
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73