Page 74 - DUOKOPT BIBLIOBOOK
P. 74

DUOKOPT  - bibliography book - CONFIDENTIAL - document for exclusive use by personnel of Laboratoires Théa – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE
                 ®









                                                         Efficacy of DTFC compared with the BTFC
                                                         AGP Konstas et al
                                                                                                       81


             combination (BTFC, Combigan) are commonly-   All newly diagnosed, previously untreated POAG
             prescribed fixed combinations for the treatment of  patients who agreed to participate and met the inclusion
             glaucoma that have been approved in several countries  and exclusion criteria in the three study centres were
             worldwide. 12,13  Separate diurnal IOP comparisons  enrolled. Inclusion criteria were age between 39 and
             between fixed and unfixed therapy with DTFC 15  and  85 years; best-corrected distance Snellen visual acuity
             BTFC 16  have reported similar efficacy. More recently, a  greater than 0.1 in the study eye; early-to-moderate
                                            17
             study in which IOP was measured over 24 h compared,  POAG (defined as patients who exhibit glaucomatous
             for the first time, BTFC with the concomitant  disc damage with disc cupping not exceeding 0.8, and
             administration of its individual components and  reproducible glaucomatous visual field loss with a mean
             reported similar efficacy between the two regimens.  deviation better than �12.0 dB in the study eye with
             Nevertheless, the mean IOP reduction over 24 h (22%)  Humphrey 24-2 SITA standard automated perimetry);
             observed with BTFC was less than anticipated. 17  patient could safely undergo wash out; open anterior
             Although this range of pressure reduction is consistent  chamber angles; untreated baseline IOP greater than
             with the evidence obtained from the regulatory trials for  25 mm Hg, and lower than 40 mm Hg at 1000 (±1 h).
             BTFC, 18,19  the extent of the 24-h IOP reduction is less than
             that observed with DTFC. 20  Specifically, with DTFC,
             reported daytime IOP reduction ranges from 27 to 33% 21–24  Exclusion criteria
             and the 24-h IOP reduction ranges between 26 and  Exclusion criteria were evidence of concurrent
             28% 25–27  in published studies.
                                                         conjunctivitis, keratitis, or uveitis in either eye; history
              At present, there are few data from randomised clinical
                                                         of ocular herpes simplex, or macular oedema; history of
             studies directly comparing these two fixed combinations,
                                                         inadequate adherence; allergic hypersensitivity,
             and the data that have been reported suggest similar  intolerance, or contraindication to either b-blockers,
             daytime efficacy. 28,29  A more detailed comparison of the
                                                         brimonidine, dorzolamide, or benzalconium chloride;
             efficacy of the two combinations can be made by  intraocular conventional or laser surgery in the study
             recording IOP throughout a 24-h period. 30
                                                         eye; child-bearing potential or lactation; previous history
              The purpose of the present study is to compare the
                                                         of ocular trauma; use of corticosteroids (within 2 months
             difference in IOP-lowering efficacy when measured over
                                                         before the enrolment), severe dry eyes; and use of contact
             24 h, between these two fixed combinations in patients
                                                         lenses. The demographics of the study patients are
             with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
                                                         shown in Table 1.
             Materials and methods
                                                         Procedures
             Informed consent was obtained from all participants
             before they entered this observer-masked, crossover  All eligible patients underwent first a timolol 0.5% run-in
             study.                                      period for at least 8 weeks before the randomisation to
                                                         either DTFC or BTFC. Enrolled patients were treated for
                                                         at least 8 weeks with timolol 0.5% given twice daily (0800
             Patient eligibility
                                                         and 2000 h). After this run-in period, they underwent a
             Consecutive adults with newly diagnosed, early-to-  timolol-treated daytime IOP assessment with three
             moderate POAG (defined as glaucomatous disc damage  separate IOP measurements performed at 1000, 1200 and
             with vertical disc cupping not exceeding 0.8. and  1400 h. Only patients with a mean daytime IOP (average
             reproducible glaucomatous visual field loss less than
             12.0 dB in the study eye with Humphrey 24-2 automated
             perimetry) were recruited in three academic participating  Table 1 Baseline characteristics (n ¼ 60 completed patients)
             centres: the Glaucoma Unit of the 1st University
                                                         Characteristic
             Department of Ophthalmology, AHEPA Hospital,
             Thessaloniki, Greece; the Center for the Study of  Male, n (%)                27 (45.0)
                                                         Female, n (%)                     33 (55.0)
             Glaucoma, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; and
                                                         Mean age (years)±SD               65.3±11.9
             Ophthalmic Consultant Centres, University of Toronto,
                                                         Range                             31.0, 81.0
             Mississauga, ON, Canada. All study candidates had to  Mean morning baseline IOP pressure (mm Hg)±SD 27.9±2.7
             exhibit a typical disc or visual field damage, a mean  Mean Snellen best-corrected visual acuity±SD  0.9±0.2
             untreated IOP greater than 25 mm Hg at baseline (two  Mean vertical cup/disc ratio±SD  0.6±0.2
             IOP measurements performed at 1000±1 h), and central  Mean visual field loss mean deviation (dB)±SD  �4.5±3.6
             corneal thickness between 500–600 mm.       Abbreviation: IOP, intraocular pressure.


                                                                                                       Eye

    74
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79