Page 18 - FSUOGM Week 25 2021
P. 18

FSUOGM                                       NEWS IN BRIEF                                          FSUOGM










       will be taken into account, as the direct   of Vitrenko as Naftogaz CEO on April 28   the Naftogaz supervisory board. As some
       interests of the Germans and Americans   was possible because that day the Cabinet   of board members were the first to point
       will come to the fore. Kuleba’s tweet might   had taken on the powers of the company’s   at the conflict of interest in Vitrenko’s
       be the strongest action that would not be   supervisory board (as the Cabinet had   appointment and showed their disrespect
       considered an intrusion by its intended   fired for a couple days the entire board   for Vitrenko in the previously mentioned
       targets,” an analyst at the Kyiv-based   in a scandalous way). “Does it mean that,   letter in May, it seems that they would be
       Concorde Capital brokerage said in a   in order to implement the NACP order,   glad to initiate such dismissal. Key question
       research note.                      Cabinet again has to terminate the power   now is: whether all this will prevent
                                           of the supervisory board members of   Naftogaz from issuing a new Eurobond in
                                           Naftogaz?” Malyska commented. He also   order to smoothly and timely refinance
       Vitrenko appointment to             expressed his doubt that a one-year ban to   its $335mn bond maturing in July 2022.
                                                                                Thus far, we see the likelihood of smooth
                                           occupy positions in Naftogaz can be applied
       Naftogaz violates anti-             to Vitrenko, who was an acting energy   refinancing as high. Clearly, to eliminate
                                                                                the existing risks, it is important that
                                           minister for less than one year.
       corruption legislation,             “illegal” and an indication of applying   the situation around the appointment of
                                              Vitrenko called the NACP’s ruling
                                                                                Vitrenko is resolved as soon as possible
       corruption prevention               of “selective justice.” He claimed he had   (either he is dismissed, or he is able to
                                           no power to influence Naftogaz at his
                                                                                challenge the ruling of NACP soon),” an
       agency concludes                    position as acting energy minister. He   analyst at the Kyiv-based Concorde Capital
                                                                                brokerage said in a research note.
                                           also stated that the one-year ban on
       The National Agency on Corruption   taking a top position in Naftogaz by a
       Prevention (NACP) concluded that the   former official violates the spirit of the
       Cabinet violated anti-corruption legislation   law, as such an item was designed to
       by concluding a contract with Yuriy   prevent official’s preferential treatment   CENTRAL ASIA & SOUTH
       Vitrenko as CEO of Naftogaz (NAFTO),   over private companies in exchange
       the agency reported on June 15. It issued   for future employment there. Also, he   CAUCASUS
       a resolution demanding that the Cabinet   provided an example when a former
       implement measures to terminate the   deputy infrastructure minister (whose   Uzbekistan in talks with
       contract, as well as cancel certain articles   department controlled Ukrainian Railways)
       of Cabinet’s April 28 resolution based on   was appointed as acting CEO of Ukrainian   Honeywell division to
       which Vitrenko was appointed as Naftogaz   Railways in 2017, and the NACP found no
       CEO. The NACP explains its decision by   conflict of interest there.     modernise refinery
       legislation on the conflict of interest that   “The NACP’s conclusions clearly made
       does not allow Vitrenko (who was an acting   reputational damage to Vitrenko and the   Uzbekneftegaz and UOP Limited, a
       energy minister before April 28 and at this   Cabinet, even in the case that they are able   subsidiary of Honeywell International,
       position allegedly prepared government   to challenge them in courts. Meanwhile,   are negotiating a project to modernise
       resolutions on Naftogaz) to occupy top   for international observers, the ruling only   and reconstruct Uzbekistan's Bukhara Oil
       positions in Naftogaz for one year.  confirms what the independent members   Refinery, Reuters said on June 16 with
         Ukraine’s Cabinet is going to question   of Naftogaz supervisory board hinted in   reference to the Central Asian country's
       the resolution of the NACP in courts, Justice  their open letter in early May. We agree   government.
       Minister Denys Malyuska commented   with Malyuska that it would be very    The companies were discussing a
       the same day. In his post in social media,   hard for the Cabinet to cancel Vitrenko’s   $184mn project, which would include
       Malyuska hinted that the NACP’s resolution   appointment without jumping into new   funding from EXIM Bank (US), it added.
       is impossible to implement. In particular,   scandals. However, the easiest way to do   An agreement to provide technical
       he recalled that the Cabinet’s appointment   it is to fire Vitrenko on the initiative of   licences for the production of Euro-5 fuel

























       P18                                      www. NEWSBASE .com                           Week 25   23•June•2021
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21