Page 25 - Daniel
P. 25

The “traditional saint” mentioned by Montgomery refers to a “Daniel”
               who  apparently  lived  about  1400  B.C.  In  1930,  several  years  after
               Montgomery  wrote  his  commentary,  archeologists  digging  at  ancient

               Ugarit (modern Ras Shamra) found some clay tablets detailing a legend
               of a Canaanite by the name of Aqhat who was the father of a man called
               Daniel. In the tablet, Daniel is portrayed as being a friend of widows and
               orphans,  and  as  a  man  who  was  unusually  wise  and  righteous  in  his
               judgments.  This  is  the  one  who  Montgomery  asserts  is  referred  to  in
               Ezekiel  14:14,  20  as  a  worthy  ancient  character  on  the  same  plane  as

               Noah and Job. Daniel, the son of Aqhat, however, was a Baal worshiper
               who  prayed  to  Baal  and  partook  of  food  in  the  house  of  Baal.  He  is
               pictured as worshiping his ancestral gods and offering sacrifices to idols.
               He was also guilty of cursing his enemies and living without a real hope
                         22
               in God.  It is hard to imagine that Ezekiel, writing by inspiration, would
               hold up such a character as an example of a godly man. Such a judgment
               is hardly in keeping with the facts.         23

                  If  the  Ezekiel  references  are  insufficient,  certainly  Christ’s  clear
               attestation  to  the  genuineness  of  Daniel  (Matt.  24:15)  should  be

               admitted as valid. Boutflower writes,


                  Now, what is the witness of Christ respecting this Book of Daniel, for
                  it is evident from His position as a teacher, His tastes, and the time at
                  which  He  lived,  that  He  must  know  the  truth  of  the  matter;  whilst
                  from His lofty morality we are sure that He will tell us the truth, the
                  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth?  How  does  Christ  treat  this
                  Book, of which the critics form so low an estimate, regarding it as a
                  religious  romance  with  a  pseudonymous  title,  and  its  prophetic

                  portion  as  a  Jewish  apocalypse,  a  vaticinium  post  eventum  [a
                  “prediction”  written  with  the  knowledge  that  the  event  has  already
                  occurred]? The answer is that this is the Book which Christ specially
                  delights to honour. To Him its title is no pseudonym, but the name of
                  a real person, “Daniel the prophet”—“the prophet” in the sense of one
                  inspired  of  God  to  foretell  the  future,  “what  shall  come  to  pass

                  hereafter.” Our Saviour in His own great Advent prophecy—Matt. 24
                  —uttered on the eve of His death, quotes this Book of Daniel no less
                  than three times [Matt. 24:15, 21; cp. Dan. 12:1; Matt. 24:30; cp. Dan.
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30