Page 284 - Daniel
P. 284

passage for anyone who accepts it as prophetic Scripture. Christ does not
               satisfy the description of verse 27 because there is no seven-year period
               related to Christ that provides fulfillment for the entire passage. On the
               other  hand,  the  normal  antecedent  of  “he”  is  “the  prince  who  is  to
               come.”  This  person  is  not  the  Roman  general  Titus  whose  forces

               destroyed Jerusalem in A.D. 70, but rather a future enemy of the people
               of Israel who will bring them into the great tribulation. This tribulation
               was  anticipated  as  still  future  in  the  book  of  Revelation,  which  was
               written  at  least  sixty  years  after  the  death  of  Christ  and  twenty  years
               after the destruction of Jerusalem.

                  The precise prophecy of verse 27 indicates that the personage in view
               enters  into  a  covenant  relationship  “with  many,”  literally,  “with  the
               many”  (cf.  “with  the  many,”  Dan.  11:39;  12:2).  This  seems  to  be  a
               reference to unbelieving Jews who will enter into an alliance with the

               coming prince. That they are Jews is indicated by “your people” (v. 24).
               If  the  preceding  chronology  is  understood  to  involve  literal  years,  this
               should also be a seven-year period. In a word, the prophecy is that there
               will be a future compact or covenant between a political ruler and the
               representatives of the Jewish people. This alliance will ultimately be to
               the detriment of the people of Israel, however promising it may seem to

               be at its inception.
                  The prophecy says that in the middle of the seven-year period the one
               who confirms the covenant “shall put an end to sacrifice and offering,”

               that is, all the bloody and non-bloody sacrifices. This could not refer to
               Christ  at  His  death  because,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  the  sacrifices  did  not
               cease  until  A.D.  70,  some  forty  years  later.  The  sacrifices  were  not
               stopped by Christ, but by the Roman soldiers who destroyed the temple.
               This prophecy contemplates a yet future event similar in nature to the
               desecration  of  the  temple  by  Antiochus  Epiphanes  in  165  B.C.  But  the

               desecration here in Daniel will be the beginning of the great tribulation
               of  which  Christ  spoke  in  Matthew  24:15–26,  obviously  future  from
               Christ’s point of view, and, therefore, not the desecration by Antiochus.

                  According to Christ, there will be a clear-cut event referred to as the
               abomination of desolation, similar to the language of 9:27, which will
               occur  in  the  period  just  preceding  His  second  advent.  Christ  said,  “So
               when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289