Page 62 - Daniel
P. 62

interpret his dream. Daniel and his friends were not among the advisors
               the  king  summoned,  though  they  had  graduated  “at  the  top  of  their
               class.”  They  were  excluded  because  they  would  have  been  among  the
               lower echelon of royal advisors due to their young age.




                       REVELATION OF THE DREAM AND ITS INTERPRETATION
                                       DEMANDED BY THE KING (2:4–6)


                  2:4–6 Then the Chaldeans said to the king in Aramaic, “O king, live
                  forever! Tell your servants the dream, and we will show the
                  interpretation.” The king answered and said to the Chaldeans, “The

                  word from me is firm: if you do not make known to me the dream and
                  its interpretation, you shall be torn limb from limb, and your houses
                  shall be laid in ruins. But if you show the dream and its interpretation,
                  you shall receive from me gifts and rewards and great honor.
                  Therefore show me the dream and its interpretation.”


                  Nebuchadnezzar gave his advisors a seemingly impossible task: to tell

               him both the dream and its interpretation. The KJV of verse 5, “the thing
               is gone from me,” has led some interpreters to feel that Nebuchadnezzar
               had  forgotten  his  dream.  But  this  is  probably  not  correct.  What  had
               “gone from” Nebuchadnezzar was not the dream, but his command that
               the  advisors  tell  him  both  the  dream  and  its  interpretation.  With  the
               wise men before him, the king announced that he has dreamed a dream,
               using  the  singular  of  “dream,”  indicating  either  that  he  had  only  one

               dream or that only one of his many dreams was significant prophetically.
                  The Chaldeans, acting as spokesmen for the group, then addressed the
               king. The phrase “in Aramaic” introduces the extended section written in

               Aramaic  instead  of  Hebrew,  beginning  with  verse  4  and  continuing
               through chapter 7. Aramaic is similar to Hebrew, but also differs from it.
               Although some have questioned whether the officials would have spoken
                                                                                      9
               Aramaic rather than Akkadian in the court at Babylon,  Aramaic was the
               diplomatic language of the time. It seems reasonable to assume the court
               included  individuals,  like  Daniel,  from  outside  Babylon,  which  would
               make  the  use  of  Aramaic  very  appropriate.  The  Aramaic  section  of

               Daniel deals with prophecy of primary interest to the Gentiles; thus this
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67