Page 14 - EXOSOMES
P. 14

www.advancedsciencenews.com                                                         www.small-journal.com





































           Figure 1.  Physicochemical characterization of goat milk exosomes. a) Transmission electron microscopy images of isolated goat milk exosomes.
           b) Size distribution established by dynamic light scattering. c) Nanoparticle tracking analysis of goat milk exosomes. d) Electron microscopy of the
           nanovesicles.
           this fact is of great importance, as exosomes differ from EVs in   high and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL), albumin,
           their cellular origin, which is the endocytic pathway. [26]  and cholesterol, also suggested that goat’s milk exosomes
             Among the identified proteins, butyrophilin, β-lactoglobulin,   did not significantly alter the inflammatory and immune
           CD36,  α-lactalbumin,  albumin,  and  xanthine  oxidoreductase   profile of treated mice after 24 h (Figure  2). Only triglyc-
           were highly abundant, as they are in milk exosomes from cow,   eride values were reduced in treated mice compared with
                          [8]
                                                                                             −1
           horse, and human.  To further confirm the exosomal nature of   untreated mice (144.13 ± 52.43 mg dL  in treated mice and
           the nanoparticles, we compared our proteomic data with Exo-  228.14 ± 86.85 mg dL  in controls); this effect was previously
                                                                               −1
           Carta and found many of the main  exosome markers. These   described for bovine milk exosomes orally administered to
           include tetraspanins such as CD9, CD63, and CD81, and other   rats. [12]  These results confirm the in vivo biocompatibility
           classical markers like TSG101, HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1, and   and non-toxicity of goat milk exosomes. Nevertheless, this
           annexins. These markers define a unique composition that dif-  evidence is still insufficient to rule out the existence of mild
           fers from other non-vesicular milk components and reveals the   or late immunogenic effects. Further research in this direc-
           nanoparticles’ exosomal nature.                    tion is warranted.


           2.3. Plasma Analysis of Healthy Mice Treated with Goat Milk   2.4. Fluorescence Labeling and Physicochemical
           Exosomes                                           Characterization of Exo-BDP and Exo-SCy5

           Biochemical analysis of plasma did not show alterations in   In order to assess the behavior of goat milk exosomes in
           basic, hepatic, or inflammatory markers compared with those   inflammatory processes,  we used a chemical approach previ-
           of control mice, thus ruling out any potential toxic effects   ously published by our group to fluorescently label the nano-
           associated  with  goat  milk  exosome  administration  (Table  S1,   particles, creating two exosome-based optical probes. [28]  The
           Supporting Information and Figure 2).              specific dyes employed in the labeling were selected based on
             Although previous publications confirmed the high   the biological application: for in vitro assessment, the nanopar-
           accumulation of milk exosomes in liver after intravenous   ticles were labeled with the commercial fluorophore BODIPY-
           administration, [27,28]  markers of hepatic damage, such as ala-  FL (Exo-BDP) as in our previous studies, [28]  while for in vivo
           nine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, did   experiments, Sulfo-Cyanine 5 (Exo-SCy5) was selected for
           not differ between treated mice and controls (Figure  2). [29]    its favorable emission in the far red spectrum. The labeling
           The evaluation of blood markers related to the immune   success was demonstrated by fluorescence emission meas-
           system and inflammatory activity, such as C-reactive protein,   urements using a fluorospectrometer, which registered over



           Small 2021, 2105421             2105421  (3 of 12)               © 2021 The Authors. Small published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19