Page 27 - Pentateuch - Student Textbook
P. 27

All this happened in approximately the year 2000 B.C., about 500 years before God gave the law to
               Moses at Mount Sinai and consecrated the descendants of Aaron to be priests. The book of Hebrews
               makes much of Melchizedek. He is “without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of
               days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest forever” (7:3).

               Commentators have speculated for centuries about this mysterious character.  Some have identified him
                                                                                                          31
               as Shem, one of the sons of Noah. He would have survived the flood by some 500 years (Gen. 11:11).
               Others, taking note of phrases such as “without father or mother” and “without beginning of days or
                                                                             32
               end of life,” suggest an angel or even the Son of God in human form.

               Yet the writer of Hebrews is simply contrasting the priestly system given under Moses to an earlier
               model. The priests under the law were required to prove their genealogy. They could not be “without
               father and mother.” They passed on the right to be a priest to sons after them. They had a beginning
               and an end in life. They did not remain a priest forever. This was the Levitical system. The implication in
               Genesis is of a system established before Moses that was superior to the Mosaic system, even though
               the Mosaic system was given by God.

               Melchizedek was a true priest of God in an older sense. He is an illustration of a cultural memory that
               had preserved instructions on how to approach God given to Noah at the time of the flood. Such cultural
               memories are reflected in the passages about Pharaoh (12:10-20) and Abimeleck (Ch. 20). The truths
               about sin, the need for a sacrifice to approach God, and a coming Savior had been passed down through
               the centuries in many different cultures. Sometimes by word of mouth, sometimes by myths, and
               sometimes by specific practices, core truths stayed alive from one generation to the next. Depending on
               other cultural values, the truths may be embellished with details or they may be sidetracked into
               significantly different expressions.

               “Melchizedek stood in the Valley of Shaveh as a figurehead or type of God’s general revelation to
                                                                                                          33
               mankind. [General revelation] influences 100 percent of mankind instead of just a small percentage!”
               As God was working with Abraham in a new and clearer way, other nations at the same time retained a
               memory of God’s work in previous generations, although these faded with each passing generation.

               15:2 – “Sovereign LORD what can you give me?” The interaction between God and Abraham surrounds
               God’s ability to give him a child since he is old. The name “Sovereign LORD (Adonai YHWH)” reflects
               Abraham’s humble, although questioning, trust in God. We might also add God’s initiation of the
               conversation as he assures Abraham. “Do not be afraid, Abram. I am your shield, and your very great
               reward” (15:1). Ultimately God Himself is the best gift Abraham could ever have.

               16:13 – “I have seen the One who sees me.” Indirectly Abraham learns about God’s omniscience and
               great care. Through a chain of events, Hagar runs away into the wilderness. God calls to her, making
               certain promises. She learns about the God who sees and returns to Abraham who has the opportunity
               to learn the same lesson.
                                                                                       yD;v; la – El

               31  F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews (Grand Rapids: Erdmann, 1991), p. 161, n. 26.
               32 Arthur W. Pink refers to a variety of suppositions in Exposition of Hebrews (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1954),
               p. 360.
               33  Don Richardson, Eternity in their Hearts (Ventura: Regal, 1984), p. 31.


                                                             26
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32