Page 138 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 138

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 131




                                      The Bright Idea                   131

                 This belief that you’ll win if only you keep on trying out bright
              ideas is, however, no more rational than the popular fallacy that to
              win the jackpot at Las Vegas one only has to keep on pulling the lever.
              Alas, the machine is rigged to have the house win 70 percent of the
              time. The more often you pull, the more often you lose.
                 There is actually no empirical evidence at all for the belief that
              persistence pays off in pursuing the “brilliant idea,” just as there is no
              evidence of any “system” to beat the slot machines. Some successful
              inventors have had only one brilliant idea and then quit: the inventor
              of the zipper, for instance, or of the ballpoint pen. And there are hun-
              dreds of inventors around who have forty patents to their name, and
              not one winner. Innovators do, of course, improve with practice. But
              only if they practice the right method, that is, if they base their work
              on a systematic analysis of the sources of innovative opportunity.
                 The reasons for both the unpredictability and the high casualty
              rate are fairly obvious. Bright ideas are vague and elusive. I doubt that
              anyone except the inventor of the zipper ever thought that buttons or
              hooks-and-eyes were inadequate to fasten clothing, or that anyone but
              the inventor of the ballpoint pen could have defined what, if anything,
              was unsatisfactory about that nineteenth-century invention, the foun-
              tain pen. What need was satisfied by the electric toothbrush, one of
              the market successes of the 1960s? It still has to be hand-held, after
              all.
                 And even if the need can be defined, the solution cannot usually
              be specified. That people sitting in their cars in a traffic jam would
              like some diversion was perhaps not so difficult to figure out. But
              why did the small TV set which Sony developed around 1965 to sat-
              isfy this need fail in the marketplace, whereas the far more expensive
              car  stereo  succeeded?  In  retrospect,  it is  easy  to  answer  this.  But
              could it possibly have been answered in prospect?
                 The entrepreneur is therefore well advised to forgo innovations
              based on bright ideas, however enticing the success stories. After all,
              somebody wins a jackpot on the Las Vegas slot machines every week,
              yet the best any one slot-machine player can do is try not lose more
              than he or she can afford. Systematic, purposeful entrepreneurs ana-
              lyze  the  systematic  areas,  the  seven  sources  that  I’ve  discussed  in
              Chapters 3 through 9.
                 There is enough in these areas to keep busy any one individual
              entrepreneur and any one entrepreneurial business or public-service
              institution. In fact, there is far more than anyone could possibly fully
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143