Page 31 - Like No Business I Know
P. 31

Somnilac

        advantage of our charter and review some of that information. And
        in this case, I’m hoping you’ll agree, it was a good thing she did.”
          Pfizer sat still, emanating disagreeability.
          “As  you  are  undoubtedly  aware,”  Ball  continued,  “theories  of
        dreaming have changed in tandem with other advances in scientific
        understanding. From earlier metaphysical models identifying dreams
        with otherworldly travels and portents, our ideas about what goes on
        in  our  heads  during  sleep  progressed  through  the  infancy  of
        psychology  into  the  Freudian  interpretation  of  dreams  in  the
        beginning of the twentieth  century. That view properly located  the
        phenomenon  within  a  purely  biological  context,  explaining  it  as  a
        necessary activity of the unconscious mind and making the content
        of  dreams  explicable  in  terms  of  personal  or  archetypal  symbols
        related to unresolved psychosexual tensions. This unfortunately left
        dream  theory  with  one  foot,  as  it  were,  remaining  in  the  camp  of
        fortune-telling  and  mythopoesis.  The  discovery  and  analysis  of
        R.E.M., or rapid eye movement, revealing the presence of dreaming
        in a sleeping individual, was the only real advance in dream science
        until the nineteen-nineties.”
          “Then, spurred by work in brain research and information theory,
        it was posited that what actually went on during dreaming was the
        reprocessing of the day’s short-term memory into long-term memory.
        The images and narratives perceived during dreaming were nothing
        more than artifacts of this physiological activity, influenced perhaps
        by  transient  emotions.  The  necessity  of  dreaming,  then,  became
        obvious,  and  the  results  of  R.E.M.-sleep  deprivation  were  finally
        understandable: people prevented  from dreaming  exhibited a range
        of negative effects, from irritability to lower intelligence test scores.
        This new theory also explained why all mammals above a certain level
        of brain development dream; Freud could never explain that.”
          Pfizer fidgeted with a large signet ring on his right pinky.
          “I  don’t  see  what  this  has  to  do  with  Somnilac’s  approval,  Mr.
        Ball.”
          “I’m  coming  to  it,  sir.  Our  researcher  wanted  to  verify  the  new
        theory  of  dreaming  by  following  up  on  the  research  subjects  in
        Schmerck’s Somnilac trials. Her hypothesis was that if your  pill really
        helped  people  sleep  better,  then  they  should  be dreaming  more;  if
        they  are  dreaming  more,  then  they  ought  to  be  processing

                                       30
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36