Page 90 - Psychoceramics and the Test of Fire
P. 90

The Vorax


          The psychoceramic partial to one-size-fits-all problem-solving may
        conceal his obsession beneath a genuine concern for human welfare
        and a hard-headed appreciation of efficiency and economies of scale.
        Avery Goodman, it quickly became apparent as I studied his history
        and habits, was one such type. A successful scientist in the primeval
        ooze  of  biotechnology,  he  had  developed  in  early  middle  age  the
        fixed notion that a single simple solution could be found for almost
        any  social  ill.  He  exercised  his  stock  options  in  his  long-time
        employer  Chimeratech,  quit  his  job  there  and  set  about
        demonstrating to the world his expertise, applicable, said he, “across
        multiple platforms of multicultural expression.”
          Had he not gone belly-up with his first scheme, he might not have
        needed  help  from  a  benefactor  like  Al  Magnus  with  the  next.  But
        both ideas were far enough off the wall to attract no one but that
        patron  of  eccentricity.  Magnus  was  determined  to  give  discredited
        crackpots one more shot at proving themselves against the orthodox
        naysayers and defenders of the status quo, buying them a ticket for
        one last ride on the merry-go-round to grab the brass ring. I was his
        instrument of financial enablement, the guy who had the talent and
        moxie to convince a suspicious and rejected prophet that someone at
        last recognized the brilliance of his plans and was ready to back that
        up with real money. But Magnus, owing to his position in corporate
        America, did not want his name associated with these ventures; thus,
        as he instructed, I resorted to subterfuge, tailoring my approach to
        the situation and personality at hand.
          Avery had arrived at hunger as a crisis capable of elimination via
        his  methods.  His  first  conclusion  was  that  the  difficulty  lay  in
        distribution, not production: the world’s wealthier people had plenty
        to eat, even more than they needed. A poor family could live on what
        a rich one threw out, and vast quantities of high-quality government-
        subsidized food were destroyed annually to support prices. What to
        do?  This  thinker-outside-the-box  seized  upon  a  previously
        unperceived relationship between the haves and the have-nots. The
        socioeconomic  extremes  normally  were  at  odds:  those  with  means
        guarded them jealously, to the point of hoarding, to avoid falling into
                                       88
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95