Page 29 - An Evening with Maxwell's Daemons
P. 29

The Planetary Steward

          “We’ve already seen a problem inherent in many of our stories,”
        began Perversity Tinderstack, whose turn it was to speak. “To wit,
        creating a conflict of cosmic proportions and then being unable to
        find a credible way out of an incredible mess. Our genre seems to
        demand it; detective fiction has a similar problem, but on a much
        smaller scale. We can avoid obvious solutions via scientific tricks by
        having our protagonist undergo the labors of Hercules to defeat the
        apparently overwhelmingly powerful enemy. That leaves the reader
        in the desirable position of being lost in the unreality of a techno-
        fantasy  while  identifying  with  real  virtues  of  determination,  quick
        thinking and self-sacrifice. But what if that enemy is us? Then we
        cannot  deny  human  weakness,  leaving  an  uncertain  outcome  or
        winner. That is my problem.”
          “If  you  are  not  a  short-term  pessimist,  it  takes  no  genius  to
        imagine the world going through a number of upheavals in the next
        century, ending in an uneasy balance between man, machine and the
        rest  of  nature.  The  dominant  player  in  that  enforced  triad  will
        perforce  be  the  machine:  an  artificially-intelligent  globally-
        networked  command  and  control  system  keeping  humanity  from
        further  harm  to  themselves  or  each  other.  This  won’t  happen
        without  desperation  on  the  part  of  the  national  elites  and  their
        militaries,  effectively  surrendering  sovereignty  to  a  computer;  or,
        more accurately, to a vast distributed software application running
        itself  without  possible  intervention  by  the  people  who  created  it.
        Thus,  no  chance  of  favoritism  or  bias.  Almost  everyone  would
        already  be  living  in  greatly  reduced  circumstances  and  obviously
        heading for extinction unless the momentous decision is made to
        trust  the  grosser  and  finer  directives  initiated  by  algorithms.  The
        world  united  de  facto  in  extremis,  without  any  of  mankind’s
        inherent  problems  solved—or  even,  most  cases,  acknowledged.
        That is the premise; or backstory, if you wish. It is nothing new in
        fiction, but I believe the general paranoia of the public is reflected
        in most writers’ evocation of sympathy for rebellion against such a
        tyrannical overlord.”
                                       28
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34