Page 31 - An Evening with Maxwell's Daemons
P. 31

The Planetary Steward

        before it becomes utterly infantilized, and master the P.S. as a tool
        wielded by responsible citizens of Earth. Crazy—I know!”
           “But  no  crazier  than  anything  else  we  cook  up,”  said  Brad
        Razeberry. “The thing to avoid is the appearance of impossibility if
        you  want  to  stay  within  the  bounds  of  science  fiction.  The
        omniscient panoptic global system resembles a deity too much for
        my  taste.  And  how  can  anyone  begin  to  rebel  when  it  has  such
        powers of observation—and intervention, I presume. If it is wrong,
        say, to chop down a cherry tree but I do it, anyway, in the dead of
        night, can I not expect the—what?—Planetary Steward to punish
        me in the morning, if not sooner? And if it doesn’t, then and only
        then  would  I  know  it  is  not  aware  of  everything  all  the  time.
        Wouldn’t that—or any even more minor infraction, like leaving the
        lights on—be at the edge of provoking a response? And therefore
        the limits would be pushed constantly by almost everyone. If you
        can get away with a little, then you might try a little more next time.
        This is a field well-plowed by social psychologists. The alternative is
        a tighter ship than anyone has ever known, run by a captain whose
        strictness  is  absolute,  unbiased  and  widely  understood  and
        acknowledged as necessary for survival. So it sounds like a prison
        planet run by wardens whose interest in rehabilitation of its inmates
        is a distant and questionable second to enforcing their sentence.”
          “Right,” chimed in Kornfleck. “Such an all-knowing AI would
        have  analyzed  our  species,  derived  a  highly  accurate  theory  of
        human  nature,  and  decided—if  you’ll  excuse  my  resort  to
        anthropomorphization—whether  or  not  we  can  be  rehabilitated.
        But that again is an imposition of our values: we want to have some
        freedom  along with our  responsibility.  Societies generally  develop
        some  parameters  and  perimeters  of  acceptable  behavior  for  the
        good  of  the  whole,  and  individuals  generally  develop  ways  of
        gaming the system and selfishly—if not destructively—taking more
        than  they  deserve.  That  leaves  gray  areas  of  transgressive
        permissiveness,  and  people  keep  pushing  the  envelope.  So  you
        might wind up with the most rational people defending the most
        repressive  conditions.  And  even  if  education  could  ultimately


                                       30
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36