Page 30 - An Evening with Maxwell's Daemons
P. 30

The Planetary Steward

            “I want to present that tension in a situation in which the actions
          of  The  Planetary  Steward,  as  I  will  call  it,  are  sometimes  as
          ambiguous  in  their  purpose  as  those  of  the  population  who
          question those actions. Therefore my sympathies, such as they are,
          would remain in the background but ultimately be for our planet
          and its preservation as the foundation of life. I know: the system—
          let me refer to it as the P.S.—might perceive its own survival or that
          of the ecosystem as requiring liquidation of humanity. But that is
          looking  at  the  conclusion,  so  I  cannot  posit  it  as  an  assumption
          without destroying dramatic tension or the point I think I want to
          make. I will set this tale about three generations after the P.S. has
          taken over management of Earth. That eliminates any of the people
          alive when the handover occurred, and gives me my characters, two
          childhood  friends  imbued  with  opposing  views  by  their  parents.
          They  will  stand  in  for  antithetical  attitudes  toward  the  P.S.  Is  a
          synthesis  possible,  making  our  future  a  bit  more  certain?  If  you
          think  not,  then  you  might  be  a  long-term  pessimist  with  a  sour
          opinion  of  human  nature.  I  won’t  reject  out  of  hand  any
          suggestions  from  any  such  persons  who  might  be  here  this
          evening.”
            She looked pointedly at Cyril Kornfleck. He responded with a
          silly smile and half an eye-roll.
            “Okay. Now these two kids are about to arrive at maturity. Boy
          and girl, so that angle is squared. Flip the script and make her the
          one  chafing  under  the  P.S.’s  watchful  eyes,  and  the  boy  the
          upholder  of  now-conservative  faith  in  the  system’s  decisions  and
          belief  in  unquestioning  obedience  to  those  dictates  as  the  only
          means  to  maintain  order  and  recover  from  past  generations’
          destructive freedoms. But I don’t want this simply to be a Platonic
          dialogue, with the author’s persona coming out on top. I guess my
          goal  is  exposition  of  the  problem  within  a  dramatic  framework.
          Apart from the interpersonal tension of these protagonists, should
          they seriously be crucial factors in the perpetuation or dismantling
          of the P.S.? Have you any suggestions for these star-crossed lovers?
          My  inclination  is  somehow  for  humanity  to  put  on  the  brakes


                                        29
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35