Page 150 - Freedom in the world_Neat
P. 150

6 Ibid., 49–50.
               7 Ibid., 64.
               8 Ibid., 219.
               9 Ibid., 228. In a related ruling, Miami Herald v. Tornillo (1974), the Supreme Court struck
               down a “right of reply” statute, finding that compulsory publication was as much a prior
               restraint as prohibiting publication altogether.
               10 Ibid., 84–88.
               11 Jane Kirtley, “Criminal Defamation: An ‘Instrument of Destruction’” (background paper,
               University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, November 18, 2003).
               12 Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), “Publisher and Editor Convicted of Criminal
               Defamation,” International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX), July 18,
               2002, http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/16982.
               13 Richard N. Winfield, “An Editorial Controversy Metastasizing: Denmark’s Hate Speech
               Laws,” Communications Lawyer 24, no. 1 (Spring 2006).
               14 Tedford and Herbeck, Freedom of Speech, 247–48.
               15 Ibid., 244.
               16 Ibid., 244.
               17 The Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press, “Reporter’s
               Privilege,” http://www.rcfp.org/privilege/index.html.
               18 Ibid.
               19 CPJ, “Texas Journalist Released from Jail,” IFEX, January 4,
               2002, http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/15393.
               20 Tedford and Herbeck, Freedom of Speech, 246.
               21 Lawyers Committee for Human Rights (Human Rights First), Assessing the New Normal:
               Liberty and Security for the Post–September 11 United States (New York: Lawyers
               Committee for Human Rights,
               2003).http://www.lchr.org/pubs/descriptions/Assessing/AssessingtheNewNormal.pdf.
               22 Douglas McCollam, “The End of Ambiguity,” Columbia Journalism Review (July/August
               2006): 23.
               23 “A Fixation with Secrecy,” New York Times, August 6, 2006.
               24 Laura Parker, Kevin Johnson, and Toni Locy, “Post 9/11, Government Stingy With
               Information,” USA Today, May 16,
               2002, http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/05/16/secrecy-usatcov.htm.
               25 Gabriel Schoenfeld, “Has the ‘New York Times’ Violated the Espionage
               Act?” Commentary (March 2006).
               26 McCollam, “The End of Ambiguity,” 21.
               27 For a complete list of cases, see the timeline compiled by the First Amendment Center,
               at http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/about.aspx?id=16896.
               28 Reporters Without Borders (RSF), “Television Reporter Fined for Refusing to Reveal His
               Sources,” IFEX, April 2, 2004, http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/57917; CPJ,
               “Journalist Convicted of Criminal Contempt,” IFEX, November 18,
               2004, http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/62652.
               29 CPJ, “Judge Jails Freelancer Over Videotape,” IFEX, August 2,
               2006, http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/76099; CPJ, “CPJ Concerned by Jail
               Sentences Imposed on Two U.S. Reporters,” IFEX, September 22,
               2006,http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/77296.
               30 &ldquo


                                                                                               Page 150 of 168
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155