Page 136 - SCANDAL AND DEMOCRACY
P. 136

Chapter Seven







                     Scandal and Democratic

                                Consolidation






                      Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove

                    that the other party is unfit to rule—and both commonly succeed, and are right.
                                                           —H. L. Mencken,  Minority Report


                   After over four decades of dictatorship, the unexpected election of Abdurrahman
              Wahid to the presidency in October 1999 was a remarkable, albeit ambiguous, devel-
              opment. Wahid’s win, if nothing else, allowed a new party to take control of the coun-
              try’s powerful executive. It did not, however, undo the compromised outcome of the
              June parliamentary elections. Compounding the symbolic damage to the democratic
              process, systemic fraud had helped the old regime’s Golkar party capture enough leg-
              islative seats to slow, if not stop, political reform and secure impunity for leaders of
              the old regime.
                   In the face of this political paralysis, the mass media served as the most critical
              force for moving the transition forward. Although the Baligate scandal was a spectacu-
              lar controversy that had mesmerized the nation and discredited Suharto’s handpicked
              successor, the use of press scandal as political weapon was not a one-time phenom-
              enon. Just as Baligate broke Golkar’s lock on the presidency, so a succession of new
              scandals would tar all the major parties and unleash cycles of retribution through
              revelation.
                   These media clashes would pitch Indonesia into a maelstrom of factional infight-
              ing that, perhaps paradoxically, helped put the transition back on track. The media’s
              role at this juncture affirmed the importance of sober analysis and carefully researched
              investigative journalism, but also demonstrated that media tendencies often faulted
              for degrading public debate in advanced democracies can play an emergent function
              in warding off the reversal of democratic transitions. The resulting confrontations
              began to shatter collusive arrangements that continued to compromise the country’s
              electoral, judicial, and economic contests. As intraelite conflict intensified from 2000
              to 2004, the media would become the main arena for its mediation, launching an era
              of politics by scandal that marked a turning point in Indonesia’s transition and made
              the media central to the next phase of democratic consolidation.


                Wahid’s Presidency
                   When President Wahid began his term in November 1999, little had changed in
              Indonesia’s balance of political forces despite eighteen months of reform. Baligate had
              ended President Habibie’s political career, but even without the executive, his Golkar
              party remained in a strong position. Thanks to its solid showing in the June elections
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141